From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Tests, Emacs-25 and Conditional Features Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 20:32:10 +0200 Message-ID: <83vb4j8wnp.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87k2l2zgre.fsf@russet.org.uk> <87h9g6xzrb.fsf@gmx.de> <87shzpxvfv.fsf@russet.org.uk> <83y49f94kt.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1458325985 9909 80.91.229.3 (18 Mar 2016 18:33:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 18:33:05 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 18 19:33:05 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1agzCo-0007O4-Hz for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 19:33:02 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45674 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1agzCo-0007Fg-1K for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 14:33:02 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45526) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1agzCQ-0007C4-Pz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 14:32:40 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1agzCN-0005qk-D9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 14:32:38 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:53887) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1agzCN-0005qg-An; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 14:32:35 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:1545 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1agzCM-0007y3-Gv; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 14:32:34 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Stefan Monnier on Fri, 18 Mar 2016 11:54:55 -0400) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:201840 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 11:54:55 -0400 > > > Maybe a test that produced a report for which features are actually > > available and working would be a possible solution. > > Not sure what you're thinking of. But maybe we could stash the summary > we emit at the end of ./configure and use that additionally to > `system-configuration-options'. Something like that. Except that the summary reported by configure doesn't mention all the features, only the main ones.