From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Suspicious warning in W64 build Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2017 18:45:07 +0300 Message-ID: <83vakkklto.fsf@gnu.org> References: <1017454172.910810.1504618695244@mail.libero.it> <1146932094.13821.1504798935795@mail.libero.it> <83mv66z66p.fsf@gnu.org> <102a4c21-c275-c73e-ec53-0d85975dc968@cs.ucla.edu> <83a825znuf.fsf@gnu.org> <831snhzkgw.fsf@gnu.org> <837ex9x7vf.fsf@gnu.org> <83tw0cwcle.fsf@gnu.org> <83h8wcw3td.fsf@gnu.org> <83377vx3d0.fsf@gnu.org> <83ingnq01t.fsf@gnu.org> <83fubrpxsv.fsf@gnu.org> <83r2v9masw.fsf@gnu.org> <86a81xrndl.fsf@gmail.com> <83a81wmijy.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1505490322 7944 195.159.176.226 (15 Sep 2017 15:45:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2017 15:45:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: andrewjmoreton@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Fabrice Popineau Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 15 17:45:17 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dssnq-0001oi-U6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 15 Sep 2017 17:45:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53880 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dssny-0001QR-9A for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 15 Sep 2017 11:45:22 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56570) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dssnn-0001Jq-Mj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Sep 2017 11:45:12 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dssnk-0004qN-Jr for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Sep 2017 11:45:11 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:36167) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dssnk-0004qD-FI; Fri, 15 Sep 2017 11:45:08 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:3671 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1dssnj-0003Ff-85; Fri, 15 Sep 2017 11:45:08 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Fabrice Popineau on Fri, 15 Sep 2017 17:33:48 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:218327 Archived-At: > From: Fabrice Popineau > Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2017 17:33:48 +0200 > Cc: Andy Moreton , Emacs developers > > Ok. I see your eassert() added at this point. > But clearly there is a problem with GCC 7, because it doesn't understand > the implications of this eassert() : Does eassume instead of eassert help?