From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Emacs 25.3 released Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2017 10:08:43 +0300 Message-ID: <83vakbciro.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87wp55t0un.fsf@petton.fr> <87r2vctasb.fsf@petton.fr> <87mv60t6sk.fsf@petton.fr> <87efrbu5hi.fsf@petton.fr> <834lrwfpsy.fsf@gnu.org> <831smzeuc1.fsf@gnu.org> <87ingbzs78.fsf@russet.org.uk> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1506064139 10244 195.159.176.226 (22 Sep 2017 07:08:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2017 07:08:59 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rcopley@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: phillip.lord@russet.org.uk (Phillip Lord) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 22 09:08:52 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dvI4w-0002CA-VN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 22 Sep 2017 09:08:51 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57018 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dvI54-0002PP-D1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 22 Sep 2017 03:08:58 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57265) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dvI4y-0002P9-8r for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Sep 2017 03:08:53 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dvI4u-0002av-6j for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Sep 2017 03:08:52 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:49844) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dvI4u-0002ar-2v; Fri, 22 Sep 2017 03:08:48 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:3474 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1dvI4t-0000Vo-Je; Fri, 22 Sep 2017 03:08:47 -0400 In-reply-to: <87ingbzs78.fsf@russet.org.uk> (phillip.lord@russet.org.uk) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:218677 Archived-At: > From: phillip.lord@russet.org.uk (Phillip Lord) > Cc: Richard Copley , emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2017 21:56:27 +0100 > > > No, it means to backport the change in the library order and then > > rebuild. The modified source tarball should be uploaded to the same > > place. > > It's possible, or possibly a new binary and a patch file for the source? I'm not sure a patch file is enough to abide by the GPL. Is there a problem to upload a full tarball? > But it all sounds like a release to me. Would Emacs-25.3.1 not be > better? Yes, 25.3.1 would be better. But I'd also add a special README to explain what it is. And I think I'd remove the 25.3 zip files, as they are not very useful. > We talking about 7b3d1c6beb54ef6c423a9? Yes.