From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs-26 threads problem [win64] Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 19:30:11 +0300 Message-ID: <83vajnotik.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83h8v7r02e.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1507653082 5982 195.159.176.226 (10 Oct 2017 16:31:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 16:31:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Fabrice Popineau Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 10 18:31:16 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e1xQx-0008OP-JQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 10 Oct 2017 18:31:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36028 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e1xR5-0003g8-1H for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 10 Oct 2017 12:31:15 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34512) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e1xQM-0003fy-CR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Oct 2017 12:30:35 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e1xQJ-0001sU-91 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Oct 2017 12:30:30 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:58048) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e1xQJ-0001sQ-5c; Tue, 10 Oct 2017 12:30:27 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:2433 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1e1xQI-0005xb-Fy; Tue, 10 Oct 2017 12:30:27 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Fabrice Popineau on Tue, 10 Oct 2017 18:13:19 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:219345 Archived-At: > From: Fabrice Popineau > Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 18:13:19 +0200 > Cc: Emacs developers > > (gdb) p stack_pos > $3 = {__max_align_ll = 0, __max_align_ld = 3.587554638101247699761989924457637e-4943} What is &stack_pos, the address of stack_pos? Is it properly aligned? Also, can you tell what Windows exception was translated into SIGSEGV? I think GDB will show that information if you issue the following command before running the segfaulting program: (gdb) set debugexceptions 1