From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs/Mutt and Efail or OpenPGP is safer than S/MIME? Date: Thu, 17 May 2018 18:09:09 +0300 Message-ID: <83vabmiaju.fsf@gnu.org> References: <878t8lfgu3.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <83o9hfk311.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1526569699 9092 195.159.176.226 (17 May 2018 15:08:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 17 May 2018 15:08:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: oub@mat.ucm.es, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu May 17 17:08:14 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fJKVq-0002I7-Ox for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 17 May 2018 17:08:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60036 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fJKXx-0007Uy-OB for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 17 May 2018 11:10:25 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42345) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fJKWh-0007OX-CA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 17 May 2018 11:09:13 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fJKWe-0000Zn-4z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 17 May 2018 11:09:07 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:50107) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fJKWe-0000Zj-1G; Thu, 17 May 2018 11:09:04 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2437 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1fJKWW-0005jX-T2; Thu, 17 May 2018 11:08:57 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Richard Stallman on Wed, 16 May 2018 23:05:24 -0400) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:225369 Archived-At: > From: Richard Stallman > CC: oub@mat.ucm.es, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Wed, 16 May 2018 23:05:24 -0400 > > > I don't think HTML rendering per se is the problem. The problem is > > when the MUA automatically fetches stuff referenced in the email as a > > URL pointing to some server. > > Indeed, that's what does it -- but this is a part of HTML rendering, > isn't it? Not a necessary part, no. E.g., Rmail invokes shr.el to render an HTML body while disabling image loading, and since shr.el doesn't support CSS, it doesn't fetch CSS, either.