From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Three cheers for Eli! Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2018 17:58:05 +0300 Message-ID: <83vaazdiiq.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20180528174225.GA4316@ACM> <300eabee-1f11-268c-619f-373399d65ad2@yandex.ru> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1528037820 19549 195.159.176.226 (3 Jun 2018 14:57:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2018 14:57:00 +0000 (UTC) Cc: kaushal.modi@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, dgutov@yandex.ru, john@yates-sheets.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jun 03 16:56:55 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fPURB-0004tL-4f for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 03 Jun 2018 16:56:53 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35573 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fPUTG-0002Lv-Ec for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 03 Jun 2018 10:59:02 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55645) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fPUSY-0002LY-2n for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Jun 2018 10:58:21 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fPUSX-0003AT-AO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Jun 2018 10:58:18 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:60200) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fPUSP-0002wA-4H; Sun, 03 Jun 2018 10:58:09 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4003 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1fPUSG-0003xc-Ja; Sun, 03 Jun 2018 10:58:00 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Richard Stallman on Sat, 02 Jun 2018 22:32:54 -0400) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:225956 Archived-At: > From: Richard Stallman > Date: Sat, 02 Jun 2018 22:32:54 -0400 > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, dgutov@yandex.ru, kaushal.modi@gmail.com > > > > The term "inclusive development projects" might fit your concept. > > > Or "community-contribution software projects". > > > > > > ​Neither suggestion rolls off my tongue. How about "community-based"? > > That term has various possible interpretations, and some of them do > not fit GNU Emacs. People might take it to imply a project that is > independent and run by whoever participates. That is not how a GNU > package works. Maybe I'm missing something: is there a problem to say "free software and open-source projects"? There's no doubt open-source projects do exist, it's just that GNU projects are not among them. But if someone wants to name them all collectively, where's the problem in that?