From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#33331: 26; doc strings of `tabify' and `untabify' Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2018 21:54:51 +0200 Message-ID: <83va54aet0.fsf@gnu.org> References: <<<2ca24662-70af-4b28-81d1-ee2d63ea531a@default>>> <<<83a7mhbbva.fsf@gnu.org>>> <<3021b990-8bdd-4af7-90cb-a66a259e2ca3@default>> <<83zhugakcv.fsf@gnu.org>> <7d5f1867-5d04-4642-b8bf-48cf9c1482f6@default> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1541879649 19378 195.159.176.226 (10 Nov 2018 19:54:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2018 19:54:09 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 33331@debbugs.gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 10 20:54:04 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gLZKV-0004vy-UU for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 10 Nov 2018 20:54:04 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39795 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gLZMc-00015v-6Q for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 10 Nov 2018 14:56:14 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46413) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gLZMT-00015q-0i for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Nov 2018 14:56:05 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gLZMQ-0006qD-4a for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Nov 2018 14:56:04 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:40738) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gLZMP-0006pH-VQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Nov 2018 14:56:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gLZMP-0001uv-Qd for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Nov 2018 14:56:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2018 19:56:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 33331 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 33331-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B33331.15418797337332 (code B ref 33331); Sat, 10 Nov 2018 19:56:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 33331) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Nov 2018 19:55:33 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44996 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gLZLx-0001uB-DD for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 10 Nov 2018 14:55:33 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:36669) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gLZLv-0001tz-F9 for 33331@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 10 Nov 2018 14:55:31 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gLZLm-0005x2-7t for 33331@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 10 Nov 2018 14:55:25 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:35257) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gLZLk-0005wi-Du; Sat, 10 Nov 2018 14:55:20 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1234 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1gLZLb-0002f8-Ko; Sat, 10 Nov 2018 14:55:18 -0500 In-reply-to: <7d5f1867-5d04-4642-b8bf-48cf9c1482f6@default> (message from Drew Adams on Sat, 10 Nov 2018 11:36:19 -0800 (PST)) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:152267 Archived-At: > Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2018 11:36:19 -0800 (PST) > From: Drew Adams > Cc: 33331@debbugs.gnu.org > > > If we are going to change those functions, I'd prefer instead to make > > a change that used the 3rd argument in non-interactive calls. > > I was going to say, "Sure, go for it". But what would > that mean in this case? Non-interactively you already > supply the START and END. What would be gained by > a Boolean argument that uses `point-min' and `point-max' > and ignores the values of START and END? Just consistency with the interactive use. Not a big deal, obviously, but then neither is the fact ARG goes on unused.