From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#34688: 26.1; Crash on Pasting from Windows clipboard Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2019 17:49:59 +0300 Message-ID: <83v9zwfomg.fsf@gnu.org> References: <835zrxh6gn.fsf@gnu.org> <834l7hgn0s.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="246158"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: npostavs@gmail.com, 34688@debbugs.gnu.org To: Patrick Brennan Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 02 16:50:22 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hBKk2-0011us-1A for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 02 Apr 2019 16:50:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52182 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hBKk1-0007H9-0W for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 02 Apr 2019 10:50:21 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:37246) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hBKjm-0007G9-9A for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Apr 2019 10:50:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hBKjk-0005BB-CN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Apr 2019 10:50:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:56128) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hBKji-00059E-1M for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Apr 2019 10:50:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hBKjh-0002eU-Sp for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Apr 2019 10:50:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2019 14:50:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 34688 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 34688-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B34688.155421659410176 (code B ref 34688); Tue, 02 Apr 2019 14:50:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 34688) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Apr 2019 14:49:54 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41439 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hBKjZ-0002e4-K3 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 02 Apr 2019 10:49:53 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:51031) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hBKjX-0002dr-Vi for 34688@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 02 Apr 2019 10:49:52 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:40515) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hBKjS-0004zZ-Ny; Tue, 02 Apr 2019 10:49:46 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4622 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1hBKjR-000121-IX; Tue, 02 Apr 2019 10:49:45 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Patrick Brennan on Mon, 1 Apr 2019 20:45:21 -0700) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:157090 Archived-At: > From: Patrick Brennan > Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2019 20:45:21 -0700 > Cc: npostavs@gmail.com, 34688@debbugs.gnu.org > > Not necessarily. If it was a Windows build issue, that code is still hanging around on a Windows branch and > may well find its way into production. I think closing the big is therefore premature. A closed bug can always be reopened, should this issue resurface. OTOH, if it doesn't resurface, we risk leaving the bug open with no clear procedure towards closing it, since negative evidence is very hard to collect.