From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#35361: 26.2; doc string of `read-buffer' Date: Sat, 04 May 2019 12:47:58 +0300 Message-ID: <83v9yqlfe9.fsf@gnu.org> References: <868c2e58-fbb5-460e-91ff-11d65c9392cf@default> Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="183672"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: 35361-done@debbugs.gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat May 04 11:49:11 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hMrI6-000lT9-8X for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 04 May 2019 11:49:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54006 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hMrI5-0007SK-8Y for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 04 May 2019 05:49:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:55844) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hMrHz-0007S9-0X for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 04 May 2019 05:49:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hMrHx-00078C-Vx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 04 May 2019 05:49:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:36857) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hMrHx-00077z-S5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 04 May 2019 05:49:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hMrHx-00026t-Q7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 04 May 2019 05:49:01 -0400 Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 04 May 2019 09:49:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: cc-closed 35361 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Mail-Followup-To: 35361@debbugs.gnu.org, eliz@gnu.org, drew.adams@oracle.com Original-Received: via spool by 35361-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D35361.15569633018059 (code D ref 35361); Sat, 04 May 2019 09:49:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 35361-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 May 2019 09:48:21 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50400 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hMrHJ-00025u-Ej for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 May 2019 05:48:21 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:41195) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hMrHI-00025j-78 for 35361-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 May 2019 05:48:20 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:47950) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hMrHC-0006p9-L9; Sat, 04 May 2019 05:48:14 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4125 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1hMrHB-0000Ws-6h; Sat, 04 May 2019 05:48:14 -0400 In-reply-to: <868c2e58-fbb5-460e-91ff-11d65c9392cf@default> (message from Drew Adams on Sun, 21 Apr 2019 15:02:37 +0000 (UTC)) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:158735 Archived-At: > Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2019 15:02:37 +0000 (UTC) > From: Drew Adams > > The doc string does not tell you what the completion candidates are > (they are apparently singleton conses with car a buffer name). So > it is impossible for a user to know what kind of PREDICATEs to define, > i.e., what kinds of completion candidates are to be accepted as arg > and tested. Thanks, fixed.