From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Prickliness of the "invalid byte code" stuff Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2019 19:31:36 +0300 Message-ID: <83v9x2svmf.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87tvcq9b0w.fsf@igel.home> Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="238301"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: eggert@cs.ucla.edu, rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 18 19:00:31 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hdHTD-000zpv-6c for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 19:00:31 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60066 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hdHTC-0002g6-4x for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 13:00:30 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:54407) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hdH19-0001Ki-9G for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 12:31:32 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:47795) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hdH19-0003kk-5L; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 12:31:31 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2412 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1hdH11-0000zr-6S; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 12:31:23 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Stefan Monnier on Mon, 17 Jun 2019 18:53:57 -0400) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:237852 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2019 18:53:57 -0400 > Cc: Richard Stallman , emacs-devel@gnu.org > > >> In any case, I think deprecating byte-compile-dynamic is a better > >> solution than trying to fix its many shortcomings, since I don't know of > >> any concrete evidence that it has any real benefit. > > This sounds good to me as well. Should I write up a patch or is this > > a controversial point? > > I'd like to have confirmation from Eli that he's OK with it. I know nothing about this variable. If my opinion is required, I will need to read up on that, or maybe someone could just tell more details about it.