From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#41117: "Cut and paste" section name in bookmarks (PDF, Emacs manual) Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 20:30:28 +0300 Message-ID: <83v9ky4e6j.fsf@gnu.org> References: <834ksslbey.fsf@gnu.org> <83h7wrk5vd.fsf@gnu.org> <837dxnj6tv.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="67983"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 41117@debbugs.gnu.org To: Sebastian Urban Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu May 14 19:31:12 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jZHhP-000HbQ-Ky for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 14 May 2020 19:31:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49322 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jZHhO-0002Hb-LT for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 14 May 2020 13:31:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41022) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jZHhG-0002Fy-0A for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 14 May 2020 13:31:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:51387) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jZHhF-0006rL-Nl for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 14 May 2020 13:31:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jZHhF-0003Iu-Ks for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 14 May 2020 13:31:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 17:31:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 41117 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 41117-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B41117.158947745212150 (code B ref 41117); Thu, 14 May 2020 17:31:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 41117) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 May 2020 17:30:52 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34700 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jZHh6-00039a-2v for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 14 May 2020 13:30:52 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:33596) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jZHh4-00032w-6a for 41117@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 14 May 2020 13:30:50 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:38543) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jZHgy-0006qd-V5; Thu, 14 May 2020 13:30:44 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3653 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jZHgx-0006qU-F4; Thu, 14 May 2020 13:30:44 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Sebastian Urban on Thu, 14 May 2020 18:51:06 +0200) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:180227 Archived-At: > Cc: 41117@debbugs.gnu.org > From: Sebastian Urban > Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 18:51:06 +0200 > > > I'm not planning on working on this soon. It would be messy to > implement > > and quotation marks in chapter titles are rare anyway. > > > So... can't we have one exception? As I wrote, it's in @section, so > it could be special case - one special case. Sorry, no. I don't want to fix Texinfo problems in our sources, especially since these problems are subtle and the "fix" looks plainly wrong to Texinfo users. Someone will come later and delete it as a mistake. We will have to wait until Texinfo fixes this.