From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Do shorthands break basic tooling (tags, grep, etc)? (was Re:
 Shorthands have landed on master)
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2021 22:41:46 +0300
Message-ID: <83v92kij2d.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <16338bdc2497fc51c6fb6d54ab370bfb@webmail.orcon.net.nz>
 <831r59kyhf.fsf@gnu.org> <YVNQJF/7tbJYPyXu@ACM>
 <jwva6jwo8ej.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> <YVNpjpmCS6X1vRu4@ACM>
 <83zgrwijys.fsf@gnu.org> <YVNti5foXOMXw8I9@ACM>
Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214";
	logging-data="9255"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io"
Cc: psainty@orcon.net.nz, emacs-devel@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca,
 joaotavora@gmail.com
To: Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 28 21:42:25 2021
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17])
	by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1mVIzh-0002Dn-6o
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 28 Sep 2021 21:42:25 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57264 helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1mVIzf-0003DM-Uj
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 28 Sep 2021 15:42:23 -0400
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:48198)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1mVIz2-00027Y-6b
 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Sep 2021 15:41:44 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:57052)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1mVIz0-0001fQ-NR; Tue, 28 Sep 2021 15:41:42 -0400
Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:1116
 helo=home-c4e4a596f7)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1mVIz0-0002ec-AQ; Tue, 28 Sep 2021 15:41:42 -0400
In-Reply-To: <YVNti5foXOMXw8I9@ACM> (message from Alan Mackenzie on Tue, 28
 Sep 2021 19:31:23 +0000)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel"
 <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:275739
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/275739>

> Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2021 19:31:23 +0000
> Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, psainty@orcon.net.nz, joaotavora@gmail.com,
>   emacs-devel@gnu.org
> From: Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de>
> 
> Hello, Eli.
> 
> On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 22:22:19 +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > > Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2021 19:14:22 +0000
> > > Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, Phil Sainty <psainty@orcon.net.nz>,
> > >   joaotavora@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org
> > > From: Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de>
> 
> > > How do you propose I find all occurrences of jit-lock-functions in the
> > > Emacs Lisp sources, which up to now I've been able to do with find and
> > > grep?
> 
> > The same as you did until now.  Nothing's changed.
> 
> .... unless somebody has decided to shorthand jit-lock-functions to, say,
> jl-functions in his file.

But no one did.  And I see no reason that we will allow that.