From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: The emacs-28 release branch has been created Date: Sun, 03 Oct 2021 21:03:26 +0300 Message-ID: <83v92e6l5d.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83lf3dgbl3.fsf@gnu.org> <6c7a9f1a-bf2d-4213-b954-2025eee1f282@cornell.edu> <838rzaa264.fsf@gnu.org> <2434455f-34f5-3e6b-b26f-db7b66cf8f3d@cornell.edu> <83ee9287ef.fsf@gnu.org> <83a6jq84wu.fsf@gnu.org> <10401c4a-1d0a-817c-942e-f08ab3130552@cornell.edu> <834k9y814j.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="15225"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Ken Brown Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Oct 03 20:07:02 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mX5t7-0003ej-7p for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 03 Oct 2021 20:07:01 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55400 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mX5t4-0006Ka-EM for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 03 Oct 2021 14:06:58 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56118) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mX5pr-0002tR-U2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Oct 2021 14:03:41 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:53720) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mX5pr-0000XQ-Fm; Sun, 03 Oct 2021 14:03:39 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:4039 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mX5pp-0004a6-PA; Sun, 03 Oct 2021 14:03:39 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Ken Brown on Sun, 3 Oct 2021 13:56:56 -0400) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:276128 Archived-At: > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > From: Ken Brown > Date: Sun, 3 Oct 2021 13:56:56 -0400 > > On 10/3/2021 1:33 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > >> make -C ../lisp compile-first EMACS="../src/bootstrap-emacs.exe" > >> make[2]: Entering directory '/tmp/emacs-28.0.60/lisp' > >> ELC+ELN emacs-lisp/comp.elc > >> ELC+ELN emacs-lisp/comp-cstr.elc > > > > This (also) regenerates *.elc files that are supposed to be in the > > tarball, which is not what we want. > > It turns out that those *.elc files are not in the tarball because of my own > stupid mistake. When I ran make-dist, I got a warning about that. I didn't > want to think about it, so I reran make-dist with --no-check rather than fixing > the problem. Ah, okay. That explains why those rules did produce the *.elc+*.eln files. So I guess, once you rebase, you will retry and see if everything does work? Thanks.