From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: bzr repository ready? Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 15:23:20 +0200 Message-ID: <83tywppbxz.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87fxjgb4ud.fsf_-_@red-bean.com> <87eiyy3lag.fsf@notengoamigos.org> <87bpu1451m.fsf@red-bean.com> <874ozs34c6.fsf@notengoamigos.org> <87k58nyih3.fsf@red-bean.com> <87d4eerm8w.fsf@red-bean.com> <87k4yy7qba.fsf@yahoo.com> <87vdiiof1d.fsf@canonical.com> <87d44ceg5s.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87bpjwe46n.fsf@red-bean.com> <87zl6vskq0.fsf@red-bean.com> <874op07kb0.fsf@red-bean.com> <87639fr3w7.fsf@red-bean.com> <87vdhfpil2.fsf@red-bean.com> <87einvxy9c.fsf@red-bean.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1258723432 2455 80.91.229.12 (20 Nov 2009 13:23:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 13:23:52 +0000 (UTC) Cc: jearl@notengoamigos.org, ian.clatworthy@canonical.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Karl Fogel Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 20 14:23:45 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NBTSf-0003Vh-T9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 20 Nov 2009 14:23:42 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45752 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NBTSe-0005Tx-W4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 20 Nov 2009 08:23:41 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NBTSW-0005SC-N0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Nov 2009 08:23:32 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NBTSR-0005MD-JP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Nov 2009 08:23:31 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=49391 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NBTSR-0005M6-1M for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Nov 2009 08:23:27 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:39003) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NBTSQ-0004CH-FO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Nov 2009 08:23:26 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0KTE00F00T67GD00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Nov 2009 15:23:14 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.70.37.193]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0KTE008KIT6N5XO0@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Fri, 20 Nov 2009 15:23:12 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <87einvxy9c.fsf@red-bean.com> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:117347 Archived-At: > From: Karl Fogel > Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 17:29:35 -0500 > Cc: Andreas Schwab , > =09Jason Earl , > =09Ian Clatworthy >=20 > Okay, I've spent some time yesterday and today checking over the la= test > Bzr conversion, which I obtained thusly: >=20 > $ scp -r kfogel@bzr.savannah.gnu.org:/srv/bzr/emacs emacs-bzr-rep= ository >=20 > Below are the results. Thanks. My knowledge of bzr is close to zero, so please be gentle with me ;-) > * Spot-check a change. [PASS] What does it mean to "spot-check a change"? Also, what are the criteria for judging these "spot-checks", according to which you say "PASS"? > These two changes in CVS... >=20 > 2006-01-12 05:20 jhd >=20 > =09* configure.in, nt/.cvsignore, nt/COPYING, nt/ChangeLog, > =09nt/INSTALL, nt/README, nt/addpm.c, nt/addsection.c, nt/cmdproxy.= c, > =09nt/config.nt, nt/configure.bat, nt/ddeclient.c, nt/emacs.rc, > =09nt/envadd.bat, nt/gmake.defs, nt/makefile.w32-in, > =09nt/multi-install-info.bat, nt/nmake.defs, nt/paths.h, nt/preprep= .c, > =09nt/runemacs.c, nt/icons/emacs.ico, nt/icons/emacs21.ico, > =09nt/inc/gettext.h, nt/inc/grp.h, nt/inc/sys/socket.h > =09(XFT_JHD_BRANCH.[3,1,1,2,2,1,1,1,1,2,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1= ,1,2]): >=20 > =09Update from HEAD >=20 > ...and... >=20 > 2006-01-12 05:24 jhd >=20 > =09* .cvsignore, AUTHORS, COPYING, ChangeLog, INSTALL.CVS, > =09Makefile.in, config.bat, config.guess, config.sub, configure, > [...too many files to list here, really, hundreds of them..= .] >=20 > ...match this merge commit in Bazaar on the XFT_JHD_BRANCH branch= : >=20 > [...] > ------------------------------------------------------------ > revno: 60734 [merge] > committer: Jan Dj=C3=A4rv > timestamp: Thu 2006-01-12 10:25:48 +0000 > message: > Update from HEAD > [...] >=20 > ....which is 40000 lines long, so I'm not including it all here. Would it be a good idea to show a few lines? Or are you only interested in the fact that the "Update from HEAD" log was caught? How about the list of files -- did you verify that it is identical to the original one? > These three changes in CVS... >=20 > 2002-10-29 04:45 lektu > =09* nt/ChangeLog (1.74): > =09Added "(tiny change)" marker. > =20 > 2002-10-29 04:41 lektu > =09* lisp/ChangeLog (EMACS_21_1_RC.237): > =09Add "(tiny change)" markers. > =20 > 2002-10-29 04:38 lektu > =09* lisp/ChangeLog (1.4464): > =09Added "(tiny change)" marker. > =20 > ...match these *two* changes in Bazaar: >=20 > (on the EMACS_21_1_RC branch): > ------------------------------------------------------------ > revno: 40805 > committer: Juanma Barranquero > timestamp: Tue 2002-10-29 09:41:08 +0000 > message: > Add "(tiny change)" markers. > modified: > lisp/ChangeLog > =20 > (on the trunk branch): > ------------------------------------------------------------ > revno: 48050 > committer: Juanma Barranquero > timestamp: Tue 2002-10-29 09:45:19 +0000 > message: > Added "(tiny change)" marker. > modified: > lisp/ChangeLog > nt/ChangeLog So what does it mean -- that the conversion tries to second-guess filesets based on log entries?