From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: bzr repository ready? Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 11:21:44 +0200 Message-ID: <83tywgmifr.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87einvxy9c.fsf@red-bean.com> <20091118230952.GB908@muc.de> <87my2jw05z.fsf@red-bean.com> <83skc9pbf7.fsf@gnu.org> <87iqd5vw5n.fsf@red-bean.com> <877htl53tc.fsf@telefonica.net> <87ws1ku7zd.fsf@red-bean.com> <87hbso4s13.fsf@telefonica.net> <83aaygoy90.fsf@gnu.org> <87vdh36d48.fsf@telefonica.net> <831vjrptha.fsf@gnu.org> <87einr63b6.fsf@telefonica.net> <83y6lzo9e7.fsf@gnu.org> <871vjr750o.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <83tywnnq34.fsf@gnu.org> <873a475bsr.fsf@telefonica.net> <87ocmu7x9c.fsf@red-bean.com> <87zl6crij4.fsf@red-bean.com> <87fx82856l.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87ws1cqqhm.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1259313805 32548 80.91.229.12 (27 Nov 2009 09:23:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 09:23:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: kfogel@red-bean.com, ofv@wanadoo.es, rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Stephen J. Turnbull" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 27 10:23:18 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NDx2r-0007vC-9v for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 27 Nov 2009 10:23:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41415 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NDx2q-00050l-TY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 27 Nov 2009 04:23:16 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NDx2H-0004ZX-05 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Nov 2009 04:22:41 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NDx2B-0004V9-Tj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Nov 2009 04:22:40 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=52641 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NDx2B-0004Uy-OS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Nov 2009 04:22:35 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:49330) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NDx29-0005g1-PO; Fri, 27 Nov 2009 04:22:34 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0KTR00000F9UY700@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Fri, 27 Nov 2009 11:21:36 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.70.37.193]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0KTR00LYEGNZVEA0@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Fri, 27 Nov 2009 11:21:36 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <87ws1cqqhm.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:117860 Archived-At: > From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" > Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 18:14:13 +0900 > Cc: kfogel@red-bean.com, ofv@wanadoo.es, emacs-devel@gnu.org > > Richard Stallman writes: > > > That's correct. There is a better way, however, which is to use > > a stacked branch. Stacked branches > > > > I don't think I have seen the term "stacked branch" before. Is it a > > different term for something that has been discussed recently, > > or is it something substantively different? > > IIRC, it's a different concept; stacked branches are relatively new. > They were developed for use on project hosts like Launchpad[1], where they > can save a huge amount of space for projects with many branches. > There are two dimensions to be considered here. Thanks for the explanations. So what would be the workflow of an Emacs hacker who also has write access to the master repository, with stacked branches? (If this is described in some existing document, a pointer there is all I need, thanks.)