From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Workflow to accumulate individual changes? Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 22:16:53 +0200 Message-ID: <83tyv6gaq2.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87fx6sm8yl.fsf@telefonica.net> <873a2slzrr.fsf@telefonica.net> <83ws03db8v.fsf@gnu.org> <87skarapxo.fsf@red-bean.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1262290495 18261 80.91.229.12 (31 Dec 2009 20:14:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 20:14:55 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ofv@wanadoo.es, lekktu@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Karl Fogel Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Dec 31 21:14:48 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NQRPt-0005zz-6E for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 31 Dec 2009 21:14:41 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36010 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NQRPt-0001to-Gc for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 31 Dec 2009 15:14:41 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NQRPn-0001t7-NZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Dec 2009 15:14:35 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NQRPi-0001rq-M0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Dec 2009 15:14:35 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=55413 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NQRPi-0001rn-Jf for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Dec 2009 15:14:30 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout21.012.net.il ([80.179.55.169]:34252) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NQRPi-000780-2w for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Dec 2009 15:14:30 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout21.012.net.il by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0KVJ00L009ETPF00@a-mtaout21.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Dec 2009 22:14:28 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.127.222.44]) by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0KVJ00I4Z9K3HDC0@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Thu, 31 Dec 2009 22:14:28 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <87skarapxo.fsf@red-bean.com> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:119170 Archived-At: > From: Karl Fogel > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , ofv@wanadoo.es, emacs-devel@gnu= .org > Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 14:44:51 -0500 >=20 > I've never used 'bzr rebase', and have no competency to evaluate th= e > arguments either way here, but... wouldn't something would smell fi= shy > if rebase were part of our regular workflow? That somehow seems wr= ong. I originally thought this was the case, but I was mistaken; see =C3=93scar's message just now. It is for a situation that hopefully = will not happen too often for too many.