From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs from head segfaults when run with -nw Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2010 14:10:11 +0300 Message-ID: <83tyrkzxt8.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83bpdyz2vz.fsf@gnu.org> <834ojqyodu.fsf@gnu.org> <83vdc4vt9g.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1270811629 8542 80.91.229.12 (9 Apr 2010 11:13:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 11:13:49 +0000 (UTC) To: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, ams@gnu.org, schwab@linux-m68k.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 09 13:13:44 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O0C9g-0003no-3C for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 13:13:44 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39951 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O0C9c-00039q-De for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 07:13:40 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1O0C6c-00028H-Lh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 07:10:34 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=47076 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O0C6b-00027a-0G for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 07:10:33 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O0C6Z-0003IG-7i for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 07:10:32 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:38153) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O0C6W-0003Hd-UL; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 07:10:29 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0L0L00600W6WJQ00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 14:10:09 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.124.92.42]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0L0L00LCBWCWA6P0@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 14:10:09 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:123387 Archived-At: > From: Eli Zaretskii > Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2010 01:35:19 -0400 > Cc: ams@gnu.org, schwab@linux-m68k.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org > > > From: Stefan Monnier > > Cc: Andreas Schwab , ams@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org > > Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2010 23:57:06 -0400 > > > > > No. Does it really work? I got the impression that it tends to crash > > > without good reasons, because it makes invalid assumptions in several > > > assertions. > > > > It does at times, yes. But note that I always build and run my Emacs > > with ENABLE_CHECKING, so those crashes are really not that common (I > > usually fix and/or report them when I bump into one). > > OK, I will try that, then. Thanks. One more question: do you recommend to enable all the checks (i.e. --enable-checking=all), or just some of them? If the latter, which checks to enable?