From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#6278: Segmentation fault at exit if server-mode Date: Sat, 29 May 2010 09:32:20 +0300 Message-ID: <83typrtdzf.fsf@gnu.org> References: <8339xdnsvu.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1275155281 5002 80.91.229.12 (29 May 2010 17:48:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 29 May 2010 17:48:01 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 6278@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lennart Borgman Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat May 29 19:47:59 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OIQ8d-0007LF-CC for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 29 May 2010 19:47:59 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52288 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OIQ8c-0007KA-5d for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 29 May 2010 13:47:58 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=49169 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OIOKG-0003SC-6E for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 29 May 2010 11:51:57 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OIFzA-0006U0-W8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 29 May 2010 02:57:33 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:60394) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OIFzA-0006Tw-TT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 29 May 2010 02:57:32 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OIFcP-0005JA-Q4; Sat, 29 May 2010 02:34:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 29 May 2010 06:34:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 6278 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 6278-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B6278.127511481020397 (code B ref 6278); Sat, 29 May 2010 06:34:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 6278) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 May 2010 06:33:30 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OIFbt-0005Iw-Mr for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 29 May 2010 02:33:29 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OIFbq-0005Ir-Bw for 6278@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 29 May 2010 02:33:27 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0L3600M004TX3000@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for 6278@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 29 May 2010 09:32:26 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.228.111.84]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0L3600KZJ4TVYP20@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Sat, 29 May 2010 09:32:20 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Sat, 29 May 2010 02:34:01 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:37389 Archived-At: > From: Lennart Borgman > Date: Sat, 29 May 2010 03:46:02 +0200 > Cc: 6278@debbugs.gnu.org > > I just saw this in dbg. It might be related but I am not sure since I > believe I got an error from make-frame in this instance. > > This error might of course have to do with the current bidi work. It's hard to do anything about such a crash without having a clear recipe for reproducing it, starting with "emacs -Q". Whatever problem caused it, happened before you invoked kill-emacs, and in a different place. > My checkout is from 2010-05-22 (and patched). > > #24 0x011d3277 in w32_abort () at w32fns.c:8183 > #25 0x010b87d9 in check_glyph_memory () at dispnew.c:2610 > #26 0x01002f8d in shut_down_emacs (sig=0, no_x=0, stuff=45467674) > at emacs.c:2198 > #27 0x01002eb4 in Fkill_emacs (arg=45467674) at emacs.c:2104 Please show the function check_glyph_memory in your sources, with line numbers. check_glyph_memory can abort in two different places, and your sources are different from the current trunk, so it's hard to know which one actually aborted. Also, is this an optimized build or non-optimized one? If the former, the line numbers shown by the debugger cannot be trusted. Finally, what are the values of glyph_matrix_count and glyph_pool_count in frame #25?