From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Is the Cygw32 port ready for testing?
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 19:09:19 +0200
Message-ID: <83txtr1zcx.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <507B404C.8050602@cornell.edu> <507B4A96.6000804@dancol.org>
	<507B6404.8080103@cornell.edu> <507B68BD.2050409@dancol.org>
	<CACZyEW+DbP3npN76vhFTbpUkFW=bZ52grW9-sqSr-DRa0y=d3A@mail.gmail.com>
	<83pq4j4pwi.fsf@gnu.org> <507C64EF.5040209@cornell.edu>
	<507C659A.2020409@dancol.org> <507C8096.2090003@dancol.org>
	<507C8180.8010601@cornell.edu> <507C81EA.1000502@dancol.org>
	<507D5FD0.4060403@cornell.edu> <83zk3m2s31.fsf@gnu.org>
	<507FF5DE.1060307@cornell.edu>
Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1350580169 22139 80.91.229.3 (18 Oct 2012 17:09:29 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 17:09:29 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: dancol@dancol.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Ken Brown <kbrown@cornell.edu>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 18 19:09:36 2012
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17])
	by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1TOtbC-0003qn-8S
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 19:09:34 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53489 helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1TOtb5-0001TU-3A
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 13:09:27 -0400
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:44092)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1TOtb3-0001SG-8z
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 13:09:26 -0400
Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1TOtaz-00058q-2w
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 13:09:25 -0400
Original-Received: from mtaout23.012.net.il ([80.179.55.175]:64972)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
	id 1TOtay-00058m-Qa
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 13:09:20 -0400
Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout23.012.net.il by
	a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id
	<0MC300E00LTAZE00@a-mtaout23.012.net.il> for
	emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 19:09:02 +0200 (IST)
Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout23.012.net.il
	(HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id
	<0MC300EXBMB2V260@a-mtaout23.012.net.il>;
	Thu, 18 Oct 2012 19:09:02 +0200 (IST)
In-reply-to: <507FF5DE.1060307@cornell.edu>
X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta)
X-Received-From: 80.179.55.175
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:154414
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/154414>

> Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 08:28:14 -0400
> From: Ken Brown <kbrown@cornell.edu>
> CC: dancol@dancol.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org
> 
> #1  0x005bf093 in emacs_abort () at w32fns.c:7706
>          button = 6
> #2  0x00536928 in staticpro (varaddress=0x807c8c) at alloc.c:5033
> No locals.

This just means NSTATIC should be bumped up again (which Daniel
already did, I see).

I think going from 0x650 to 0x1000 is too much.  But I'll let Stefan
decide.