From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#14574: prog-prettify-symbols breaks font-locking Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 19:44:28 +0300 Message-ID: <83txkwsn4j.fsf@gnu.org> References: <8338sjusds.fsf@gnu.org> <838v29tpz3.fsf@gnu.org> <837ghsu6it.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1371487521 16279 80.91.229.3 (17 Jun 2013 16:45:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 16:45:21 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 14574@debbugs.gnu.org To: Juanma Barranquero Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 17 18:45:21 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UocYM-0001ZL-Ge for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 18:45:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35037 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UocYM-0001XZ-6t for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 12:45:14 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60111) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UocYI-0001W8-0o for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 12:45:11 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UocYB-0000RK-K6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 12:45:09 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:56716) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UocYB-0000QV-6z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 12:45:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1UocY9-0007S6-UO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 12:45:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 16:45:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 14574 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 14574-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B14574.137148748728615 (code B ref 14574); Mon, 17 Jun 2013 16:45:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 14574) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Jun 2013 16:44:47 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51032 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1UocXu-0007RR-Gw for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 12:44:46 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:55873) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1UocXs-0007RB-Ge for 14574@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 12:44:44 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MOJ00C00QH80100@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for 14574@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 19:44:26 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MOJ00B3RQI2AQL0@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 19:44:26 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:75263 Archived-At: > From: Juanma Barranquero > Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 18:24:11 +0200 > Cc: Kenichi Handa , 14574@debbugs.gnu.org > > I'm assuming that we usually go for fixing real problems versus > perceived ones. Let's see... You examine a bridge and discover that one of its supports is shaky, and will probably not hold when the next storm comes. Is that a real problem or a perceived one? ;-)