From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: image-size Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 21:15:44 +0300 Message-ID: <83txksodgv.fsf@gnu.org> References: <837ghopy8a.fsf@gnu.org> <83zjukog7h.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1371752154 19803 80.91.229.3 (20 Jun 2013 18:15:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 18:15:54 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 20 20:15:54 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UpjOf-0005oS-J6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 20:15:49 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39518 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UpjOf-0006tJ-2t for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 14:15:49 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40857) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UpjOW-0006e0-58 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 14:15:44 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UpjOS-0004Xk-Da for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 14:15:40 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout21.012.net.il ([80.179.55.169]:48844) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UpjOS-0004Xd-5w for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 14:15:36 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout21.012.net.il by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MOP00800EMG5Y00@a-mtaout21.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 21:15:34 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MOP007JAEPYYTA0@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 21:15:34 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 80.179.55.169 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:160764 Archived-At: > From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 19:54:38 +0200 > > >> The next call is a lot faster, meaning that something has been pushed to > >> X already: > >> > >> (benchmark-elapse (image-size (create-image "/tmp/0.jpg") nil)) > >> => 0.000274576 > > > > It's not pushed to X, it is cached internally by Emacs in its image > > cache. > > If it's not transferred via X, why is it slow when running Emacs over > ssh, but not locally? I don't know. Please profile image-size using the built-in profiler, in a loop that clears the image cache after each call to image-size (using clear-image-cache or image-flush).