From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: key-binding for cycle-spacing Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 20:49:10 +0200 Message-ID: <83txcm7heh.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83y51y7ke7.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1391021362 21515 80.91.229.3 (29 Jan 2014 18:49:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 18:49:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 29 19:49:29 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1W8aCV-0005zU-T8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 19:49:28 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44766 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W8aCV-000626-9I for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 13:49:27 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46666) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W8aCM-00061X-Sy for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 13:49:24 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W8aCH-0001gp-2z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 13:49:18 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout29.012.net.il ([80.179.55.185]:59182) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W8aCG-0001gR-Rk; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 13:49:13 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout29.012.net.il by mtaout29.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0N0600100EPQUP00@mtaout29.012.net.il>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 20:50:44 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout29.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0N0600358F0KCX00@mtaout29.012.net.il>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 20:50:44 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 80.179.55.185 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:169211 Archived-At: > From: Glenn Morris > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 13:35:57 -0500 > > Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > Not during feature freeze, please. > > It's a new command I have only discovered now when going through the > NEWS to do documentation updates. So: > > i) It was impossible for me to propose this before now, because I was > unaware of it. > > ii) IMO this kind of polishing/smoother integration of features > implemented during the previous development cycle is part of the point > of a feature freeze. I hear you, but M-SPC is a very old keybinding, so I'm not sure we should change that now. That said, it's just my opinion (you asked for opinions, right?).