From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: read-event in batch mode Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 16:58:29 +0200 Message-ID: <83txck5hbe.fsf@gnu.org> References: <831tzo74oz.fsf@gnu.org> <87txckgtbk.fsf@gmx.de> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1391180325 17373 80.91.229.3 (31 Jan 2014 14:58:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 14:58:45 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Michael Albinus Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 31 15:58:49 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1W9FYN-0001iQ-JP for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 31 Jan 2014 15:58:47 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56178 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W9FYN-0000g5-Ad for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 31 Jan 2014 09:58:47 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53397) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W9FYC-0008Px-Mg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 31 Jan 2014 09:58:43 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W9FY7-0002Cl-EQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 31 Jan 2014 09:58:36 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout28.012.net.il ([80.179.55.184]:58839) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W9FY7-0002By-6y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 31 Jan 2014 09:58:31 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout28.012.net.il by mtaout28.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0N0900N00TH8WU00@mtaout28.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 31 Jan 2014 16:59:55 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout28.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0N0900M8TTNVM720@mtaout28.012.net.il>; Fri, 31 Jan 2014 16:59:55 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <87txckgtbk.fsf@gmx.de> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 80.179.55.184 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:169273 Archived-At: > From: Michael Albinus > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 14:43:43 +0100 > > In general, I believe that events arriving from D-Bus or file change > notifications and alike, shouldn't go via the keyboard buffer. Such > events shall have their own handling in the main loop. The "keyboard buffer" is a misnomer: that's actually the Emacs event queue, where all kinds of events end up, and from which they are read and processed. Why is it a good idea to have more than one event queue?