From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#17706: 24.4.50; locked file error in rmail-insert-inbox-text Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 22:39:35 +0300 Message-ID: <83tx766t1k.fsf@gnu.org> References: <8338eq8zn1.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1403898085 14365 80.91.229.3 (27 Jun 2014 19:41:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 19:41:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 17706@debbugs.gnu.org, kdo@cosmos.phy.tufts.edu To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jun 27 21:41:18 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1X0c1M-0004Hx-Qc for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 27 Jun 2014 21:41:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52220 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X0c1M-0002ZW-9P for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 27 Jun 2014 15:41:16 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41722) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X0c1F-0002XO-5J for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jun 2014 15:41:14 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X0c19-0000yX-F8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jun 2014 15:41:09 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:44162) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X0c19-0000yO-CG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jun 2014 15:41:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1X0c17-00010O-QQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jun 2014 15:41:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 19:41:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 17706 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 17706-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B17706.14038980033768 (code B ref 17706); Fri, 27 Jun 2014 19:41:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 17706) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Jun 2014 19:40:03 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35311 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1X0c06-0000yG-RU for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jun 2014 15:40:02 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:48359) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1X0c03-0000xw-9y for 17706@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jun 2014 15:39:56 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0N7U00A00EIDRP00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for 17706@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jun 2014 22:39:48 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0N7U00AEREMBHAA0@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Fri, 27 Jun 2014 22:39:48 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:90909 Archived-At: > From: Glenn Morris > Cc: Ken Olum , 17706@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 11:54:14 -0400 > > Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > Thanks. This looks OK to me. I will wait a few days for comments, > > and commit then. > > My only comment is that this looks like the last "tiny change" we can > accept without an assignment. It changes exactly 5 lines of code, all the rest is either existing code or comments.