From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.orgmode,gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Sync up the org in emacs master to org maint branch? Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2017 19:32:56 +0200 Message-ID: <83tw8cv6pj.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87k29d7zvw.fsf@engster.org> <87fuk08i01.fsf@engster.org> <87d1f36xnc.fsf@engster.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1486056864 30687 195.159.176.226 (2 Feb 2017 17:34:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2017 17:34:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: deng@randomsample.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org, bzg@gnu.org, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, kaushal.modi@gmail.com, phillip.lord@russet.org.uk To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 02 18:34:18 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cZLH0-0007j0-HH for geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane.org; Thu, 02 Feb 2017 18:34:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58141 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cZLH5-000133-UB for geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane.org; Thu, 02 Feb 2017 12:34:23 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50987) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cZLG6-0000zq-4u for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Feb 2017 12:33:25 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cZLG2-0000wO-EL for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Feb 2017 12:33:22 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:54733) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cZLFx-0000uM-ED; Thu, 02 Feb 2017 12:33:13 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:2396 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1cZLFw-0006tA-9U; Thu, 02 Feb 2017 12:33:12 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Thu, 02 Feb 2017 13:10:07 +0100) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.orgmode:111862 gmane.emacs.devel:211881 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2017 13:10:07 +0100 > Cc: Bastien Guerry , Emacs developers , > Phillip Lord , > emacs-org list , > Kaushal Modi > > If Django had traditionally always been distributed along with Python, > and maintained in the Python repo, and the suggestion now would be to > move Django to a part of the Python repo that very few developers look > at, but Django would continue to be distributed with Python, and all > Django bug reports would continue to go to the Python bug repository, > and Python developers would continue to be responsible for QA and bug > fixing of Django. I believe the intent is to make it so that checking out and building Emacs also checks out and builds all the packages that are intended to be part of a release tarball. If we indeed do that this way, there will be no difference, QA-wise, between core packages and ELPA packages that are logically part of an Emacs release.