From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#28736: 24.5; doc of `push' Date: Sun, 08 Oct 2017 21:13:15 +0300 Message-ID: <83tvz9se2s.fsf@gnu.org> References: <<<53afe0a4-8ce5-45fc-9e18-6bf52018c9b6@default>>> <<<83h8vatbtk.fsf@gnu.org>>> <<09655ed0-be2c-4453-9755-224ec733e221@default>> <<83wp45sgrm.fsf@gnu.org>> <9d23e7ad-ff25-4dac-b598-6614b272bebc@default> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1507486461 11471 195.159.176.226 (8 Oct 2017 18:14:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 8 Oct 2017 18:14:21 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 28736@debbugs.gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Oct 08 20:14:14 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e1G5b-0001O2-Je for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 08 Oct 2017 20:14:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54634 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e1G5f-0007IK-Tj for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 08 Oct 2017 14:14:15 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60227) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e1G5X-0007Hu-4Q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Oct 2017 14:14:11 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e1G5S-0006D9-NB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Oct 2017 14:14:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:47953) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e1G5S-0006D0-Kh for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Oct 2017 14:14:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e1G5S-0000S5-BR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Oct 2017 14:14:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 08 Oct 2017 18:14:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 28736 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 28736-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B28736.15074864231704 (code B ref 28736); Sun, 08 Oct 2017 18:14:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 28736) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Oct 2017 18:13:43 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56633 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e1G55-0000RM-Mn for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 08 Oct 2017 14:13:43 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:40947) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e1G50-0000R4-TE for 28736@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 08 Oct 2017 14:13:38 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e1G4r-0005vv-7e for 28736@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 08 Oct 2017 14:13:29 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:41598) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e1G4r-0005vp-41; Sun, 08 Oct 2017 14:13:25 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:4290 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1e1G4p-0001FA-Ju; Sun, 08 Oct 2017 14:13:24 -0400 In-reply-to: <9d23e7ad-ff25-4dac-b598-6614b272bebc@default> (message from Drew Adams on Sun, 8 Oct 2017 10:48:32 -0700 (PDT)) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:138081 Archived-At: > Date: Sun, 8 Oct 2017 10:48:32 -0700 (PDT) > From: Drew Adams > Cc: 28736@debbugs.gnu.org > > > > The right question is why is it a problem to document this? > > > > Because we don't want to guarantee the return value won't > > change in the future? > > Are you sure? No. > When was that decided? I don't know if it was decided and when, I was just wondering whether the lack of documentation is deliberate or an omission. > Just now? That's uncalled-for. > And why ""? I wonder if your answer might have been > different if a different person had filed this bug... Why would you wonder about that? Have I ever treated your bug reports different from anyone else's?