From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: select-frame-set-input-focus fails to raise the frame Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2017 22:44:43 +0200 Message-ID: <83tvwrsouc.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20171213204737.GA1621@breton.holly.idiocy.org> <20171213222634.GA2144@breton.holly.idiocy.org> <831sjwt1jf.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1513370720 28316 195.159.176.226 (15 Dec 2017 20:45:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2017 20:45:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: alan@idiocy.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: rswgnu@gmail.com Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 15 21:45:16 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ePwr6-00077T-FU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 15 Dec 2017 21:45:16 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48448 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ePwrD-0003BA-JJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 15 Dec 2017 15:45:23 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49483) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ePwqe-0003B0-1z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Dec 2017 15:44:48 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ePwqa-00088i-Ul for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Dec 2017 15:44:48 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:46842) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ePwqa-00088K-Rj; Fri, 15 Dec 2017 15:44:44 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1617 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1ePwqa-0004of-4v; Fri, 15 Dec 2017 15:44:44 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from Robert Weiner on Fri, 15 Dec 2017 12:38:15 -0500) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:221112 Archived-At: > From: Robert Weiner > Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2017 12:38:15 -0500 > Cc: Alan Third , emacs-devel > > ​The problem was that I would set-window-buffer in the new frame > to a different buffer and that buffer would not display when > the new frame was brought frontmost and displayed temporarily > with a sleep-for delay. Calling force-window-update had no > effect but calling (redisplay t) resolved it. What do you mean by "displayed temporarily"? As long as the current command runs, Emacs will not enter redisplay; an explicit call to 'redisplay' is the only exception to that rule. So it sounds like what you describe is Emacs working as designed.