From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: The name gnus-cloud.el Date: Mon, 01 Jan 2018 06:42:16 +0200 Message-ID: <83tvw6chqv.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87374jd66s.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87bmj6dda0.fsf@linux-m68k.org> <87vahe911g.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87374id7jy.fsf@linux-m68k.org> <877ett8g7k.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87a7yn7tqp.fsf@lifelogs.com> <878te75xa1.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87ind6l2tt.fsf@lifelogs.com> <877etklvsa.fsf@lifelogs.com> <83y3m0pv8u.fsf@gnu.org> <86608msw0h.fsf@dod.no> <838tdiet25.fsf@gnu.org> <87y3li4vh7.fsf@telefonica.net> <87efnan46u.fsf@linux-m68k.org> <86wp12qtgo.fsf@dod.no> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1514781640 2235 195.159.176.226 (1 Jan 2018 04:40:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2018 04:40:40 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Steinar Bang Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 01 05:40:36 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eVrtp-0008VX-Qx for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 01 Jan 2018 05:40:33 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36594 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eVrvn-0004JU-4X for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 31 Dec 2017 23:42:35 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42359) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eVrvg-0004IR-EJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 31 Dec 2017 23:42:29 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eVrvd-0001jp-81 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 31 Dec 2017 23:42:28 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:39556) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eVrvd-0001jg-3i; Sun, 31 Dec 2017 23:42:25 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3140 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1eVrvc-0000s4-4Y; Sun, 31 Dec 2017 23:42:24 -0500 In-reply-to: <86wp12qtgo.fsf@dod.no> (message from Steinar Bang on Mon, 01 Jan 2018 02:05:27 +0100) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:221496 Archived-At: > From: Steinar Bang > Date: Mon, 01 Jan 2018 02:05:27 +0100 > > >>>>> Andreas Schwab : > > > On Dez 31 2017, Óscar Fuentes wrote: > >> Most likely, the migration tool didn't bother to perform a `git mv > >> ' and did the equivalent of `cp ; git rm ; > >> git add ' instead. > > > No, that's exactly the same operation. The problem is that commit > > b8d4c8d0e9 didn't rename anything. > > Yep. This commit only adds that file, and doesn't remove the existing > file The file was removed in the previous commit. > 2007? Was that still CVS? Or was that during bazaar? It was Bazaar. > How did bazaar track renames? Bazaar did track renames, but that commit didn't use "bzr mv". > How was bazaar renames handled during the conversion to git? I have no idea, but you see the results in the Git repository.