From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Split `simple.el'? Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2018 05:38:48 +0300 Message-ID: <83tvsjyedj.fsf@gnu.org> References: <5f1e960c-483f-4902-b4c2-b7a4ca3b04f4@default> <83muyj4hzt.fsf@gnu.org> <87h8oqc1cr.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83k1tm2ntt.fsf@gnu.org> <87a7ue3gm7.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83h8olzu08.fsf@gnu.org> <87sh85u25x.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <837ephyv79.fsf@gnu.org> <878t9wqfzj.fsf@mail.linkov.net> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1523327807 3218 195.159.176.226 (10 Apr 2018 02:36:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2018 02:36:47 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Juri Linkov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 10 04:36:42 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f5j9G-0000jc-ME for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 10 Apr 2018 04:36:42 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58517 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f5jBM-0005mv-GR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 09 Apr 2018 22:38:52 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56547) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f5jBF-0005ko-RL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Apr 2018 22:38:46 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f5jBC-0008VF-O1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Apr 2018 22:38:45 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:40014) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f5jBC-0008VB-Jf; Mon, 09 Apr 2018 22:38:42 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4685 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1f5jBB-0002nm-TL; Mon, 09 Apr 2018 22:38:42 -0400 In-reply-to: <878t9wqfzj.fsf@mail.linkov.net> (message from Juri Linkov on Mon, 09 Apr 2018 23:31:12 +0300) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:224484 Archived-At: > From: Juri Linkov > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2018 23:31:12 +0300 > > >> > Do less than a dozen files justify a separate subdirectory? > >> > >> Better to have a dozen files in a separate subdirectory than > >> just 2 files that already exist in the subdirectory “images”. > > > > Maybe we should move those 2 into the parent directory, and remove > > 'images'? > > I believe more than a dozen files justifies a separate directory, > including the packages for PostScript images: > > compface.el > doc-view.el > ezimage.el > gravatar.el > iimage.el > image.el > image-dired.el > image-file.el > image-mode.el > ps-bdf.el > ps-def.el > ps-mule.el > ps-print.el > ps-print-loaddefs.el > ps-samp.el > smiley.el > svg.el > thumbs.el ps-*.el have nothing to do with images, so that still leaves us with too few, IMO. > This list is open-ended for new files, such as for e.g. currently discussed > new mode for continuous image scrolling. Such scrolling will definitely work for tall fonts as well, so again unrelated.