From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#22000: Patch addressing the menu-bar frame-resize interaction Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2018 05:39:17 +0300 Message-ID: <83tvlgt44q.fsf@gnu.org> References: <<87k2p8h1vn.fsf@isaac.fritz.box>> <<5B52E425.8010608@gmx.at>> <> <<5B543148.1010004@gmx.at>> <> <<5B557ACA.4020106@gmx.at>> <> <<5BBF93CF.4060301@gmx.at>> <> <<5BC05EEB.9010609@gmx.at>> <> <<5BC0E405.90805@gmx.at>> <> <<5BC1AAE2.7070808@gmx.at>> <> <<5BC4DB0E.3050501@gmx.at>> <> <<5BC6E4F2.2030607@gmx.at>> <> <<5BC83F03.4050006@gmx.at>> <> <<83o9brqs6e.fsf@gnu.org>> <> <<83bm7rqfpo.fsf@gnu.org>> <<766dc2b9-7931-48b2-b2f2-6b57d7ca85dd@default>> <<835zxyqwtg.fsf@gnu.org>> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1540089960 13518 195.159.176.226 (21 Oct 2018 02:46:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2018 02:46:00 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 22000@debbugs.gnu.org, vivek@etla.org, deng@randomsample.de To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Oct 21 04:45:56 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gE3kZ-0003R6-4I for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 21 Oct 2018 04:45:55 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57235 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gE3mf-0006kI-Cm for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 20 Oct 2018 22:48:05 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59392) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gE3mM-0006UF-R3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Oct 2018 22:47:49 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gE3es-0000Pg-Fp for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Oct 2018 22:40:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:57650) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gE3es-0000PZ-C3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Oct 2018 22:40:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gE3es-00033P-7s for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Oct 2018 22:40:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2018 02:40:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22000 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 22000-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B22000.154008959411719 (code B ref 22000); Sun, 21 Oct 2018 02:40:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 22000) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Oct 2018 02:39:54 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33675 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gE3ek-00032x-8j for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 20 Oct 2018 22:39:54 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:49259) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gE3ej-00032l-4G for 22000@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 20 Oct 2018 22:39:53 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gE3ea-0000B3-Tw for 22000@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 20 Oct 2018 22:39:47 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:50718) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gE3eQ-0008VE-J6; Sat, 20 Oct 2018 22:39:34 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2093 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1gE3eQ-0003rY-6R; Sat, 20 Oct 2018 22:39:34 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Drew Adams on Sat, 20 Oct 2018 16:58:37 -0700 (PDT)) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:151477 Archived-At: > Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2018 16:58:37 -0700 (PDT) > From: Drew Adams > Cc: vivek@etla.org, 22000@debbugs.gnu.org, deng@randomsample.de > > > > FWIW - AFAIK, it is not Emacs convention to add a blank line > > > between the first and second lines of text in a doc string. > > > > Quite a few of doc strings do leave an empty line there, and I find > > nothing wrong with that. > > There are quite a few places in Emacs where things > are done in a less than ideal or conventional way. > Nothing-wrong versus room-for-improvement, perhaps. It's okay to think that style is not ideal, but please don't represent the other style as our guidelines when they aren't. We should distinguish between our personal opinions and the project's policy.