From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Ctrl-[ ? Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2019 17:37:56 +0300 Message-ID: <83tvd2rd8b.fsf@gnu.org> References: <08AC8151-5911-40FA-8B20-818B839D00AB@traduction-libre.org> <6F55E018-B15E-42B0-8794-21F55BBA23D3@traduction-libre.org> <34E3289C-10EE-4A23-AEE4-80D984DB2EDE@gnu.org> <6A538FF9-94C8-491D-B1B9-5C0D09FE7C39@acm.org> <838suesw93.fsf@gnu.org> <3580dbb9-73a8-d26a-5466-5799e3726c34@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="48324"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: =?utf-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Pit-Claudel Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 06 16:38:15 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hYtWw-000CQt-JU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 06 Jun 2019 16:38:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33318 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hYtWv-0002J8-2R for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 06 Jun 2019 10:38:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:57076) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hYtWp-0002J2-LX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Jun 2019 10:38:08 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:46504) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hYtWp-0001w2-Iz; Thu, 06 Jun 2019 10:38:07 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2050 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1hYtWo-0005I2-Sx; Thu, 06 Jun 2019 10:38:07 -0400 In-reply-to: <3580dbb9-73a8-d26a-5466-5799e3726c34@gmail.com> (message from =?utf-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Pit-Claudel on Thu, 6 Jun 2019 09:26:54 -0400) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:237286 Archived-At: > From: Clément Pit-Claudel > Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2019 09:26:54 -0400 > > > Why is it useful to have different behavior on GUI and TTY frames? > > It's not so much that it's useful to have different behavior; rather, there are limitations that only TTY frames suffer from, and if you mostly or always use GUI frames, it's nice not to suffer from these limitations. That's not the same. C-[ being the same as ESC is very basic, like C-g, so having to remember that it might not work on GUI frames would be a PITA at least for me. > So I guess keeping a consistent experience in TTY and GUI frames isn't as important for me as improving the experience in GUI frames. IMO, being able to bind C-[ to something else is not an important feature, not enough to break the compatibility. But that's me.