From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#6861: 24.0.50; Scroll lock not bound Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2019 19:49:47 +0300 Message-ID: <83tvaajwes.fsf@gnu.org> References: <837e77lo3g.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="232483"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: dak@gnu.org, 6861@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Kangas Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Aug 21 18:57:07 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1i0Tv1-000yMx-PH for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 18:57:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50628 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1i0Tv0-0005NL-KD for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 12:57:06 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33690) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1i0ToB-0005nb-4J for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 12:50:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i0ToA-0005Pj-5W for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 12:50:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:55830) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i0ToA-0005PC-1J for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 12:50:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i0To9-0002D8-Sz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 12:50:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2019 16:50:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 6861 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 6861-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B6861.15664061908458 (code B ref 6861); Wed, 21 Aug 2019 16:50:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 6861) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Aug 2019 16:49:50 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36418 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i0Tny-0002CL-Cz for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 12:49:50 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:49550) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i0Tnw-0002By-Hs for 6861@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 12:49:48 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:44770) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i0Tnr-0004Zb-Ca; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 12:49:43 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1958 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1i0Tno-00072J-9e; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 12:49:40 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Stefan Kangas on Tue, 20 Aug 2019 20:28:15 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:165509 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Kangas > Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2019 20:28:15 +0200 > Cc: David Kastrup , 6861@debbugs.gnu.org > > > What about w32-scroll-lock-modifier? > > I'm unfortunately not familiar with that at all, since I never use > Windows. Nor do I currently have access to any Windows boxes for > testing. Would this patch break something on w32, or would it just > not work there? It might not work if w32-scroll-lock-modifier was customized to have ScrollLock act as a modifier key.