From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Why are so many great packages not trying to get included in GNU Emacs? Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2020 09:49:57 +0300 Message-ID: <83tv1883fu.fsf@gnu.org> References: <9mmFgzvrBwjt_n_VJyaJdXINraNi5HsGpwq-0MLeKiJA7kG2BQA4uywrzjyz7lpRS0OZDpjEi8lspOKYUA7P_QsODsDew_8nbH960G55fmY=@protonmail.com> <97DA7804-F647-4A1D-B8E0-AFFE7A324C64@gmail.com> <87d07xamrg.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <878silajdl.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87tv18pyh4.fsf@russet.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="104033"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: =?utf-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Pit-Claudel Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Apr 25 08:50:41 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jSEe9-000QzM-2G for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 25 Apr 2020 08:50:41 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59542 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jSEe8-0004cR-2G for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 25 Apr 2020 02:50:40 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58312) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jSEdd-00042h-35 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Apr 2020 02:50:09 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:49676) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jSEdc-0000Kb-RX; Sat, 25 Apr 2020 02:50:08 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4589 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jSEdb-0008Bt-HP; Sat, 25 Apr 2020 02:50:08 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from =?utf-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Pit-Claudel on Sat, 25 Apr 2020 00:22:39 -0400) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:247753 Archived-At: > From: Clément Pit-Claudel > Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2020 00:22:39 -0400 > > On 24/04/2020 23.11, Stefan Monnier wrote: > > But we could maintain a list of people who have signed the paperwork, > > built from publicly available information, i.e. from the Git log of > > emacs.git and elpa.git. While not being on that list wouldn't be > > a guarantee that paperwork is needed, it would still be helpful, > > I think. > > > > Any taker? > > git log --format="%aE" | sort | uniq ? This needs to be audited to exclude people who don't have assignment.