From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#41100: 2 undefined references and missing character (Emacs manual, PDF) Date: Sat, 09 May 2020 13:15:34 +0300 Message-ID: <83tv0pfm7t.fsf@gnu.org> References: <159ca2b9-e9c3-a01d-080b-3201ed8c5a79@gmail.com> <83mu6iirw7.fsf@gnu.org> <9d14d258-dac9-3c73-aed6-8f9426325fad@gmail.com> <834ksqihio.fsf@gnu.org> <4c996d16-8079-8813-c0b1-fd07798ce03d@gmail.com> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="94276"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 41100@debbugs.gnu.org To: Sebastian Urban Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat May 09 12:16:11 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jXMWh-000OQQ-Nc for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 09 May 2020 12:16:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45684 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jXMWg-0008A0-6h for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 09 May 2020 06:16:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39244) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jXMWY-00088F-QR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 May 2020 06:16:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:35261) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jXMWY-0004xJ-H0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 May 2020 06:16:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jXMWY-0004Rn-Ck for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 May 2020 06:16:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 09 May 2020 10:16:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 41100 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 41100-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B41100.158901935117074 (code B ref 41100); Sat, 09 May 2020 10:16:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 41100) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 May 2020 10:15:51 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46807 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jXMWN-0004RK-Cu for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 09 May 2020 06:15:51 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:36130) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jXMWM-0004R7-Ke for 41100@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 09 May 2020 06:15:50 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:49492) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jXMWH-0004Ok-Dm; Sat, 09 May 2020 06:15:45 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2613 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jXMWG-0000dj-Sa; Sat, 09 May 2020 06:15:45 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4c996d16-8079-8813-c0b1-fd07798ce03d@gmail.com> (message from Sebastian Urban on Sat, 9 May 2020 12:04:09 +0200) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:179964 Archived-At: > Cc: 41100@debbugs.gnu.org > From: Sebastian Urban > Date: Sat, 9 May 2020 12:04:09 +0200 > > As an alternative "Bah@'a'@U{00ED}" also seems to work. It is > shorter, but it is also less readable. But Glenn says the original also works. Also, I understand from you that the log is the only indication of some problem, the actual PDF is OK. In which case I see no reason to make our manual harder to read in its Texinfo form. Glenn, can you please chime in and tell what you see on your systems, and more generally what is your take on this issue? TIA.