From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#8399: 23.3; save-some-buffers ignores buffer names Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 18:01:14 +0300 Message-ID: <83tuwq4vnp.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83y63vm0v4.fsf@cs.bham.ac.uk> <87imd697mo.fsf@gnus.org> <83wo1m4wj1.fsf@gnu.org> <875z967pd2.fsf@gnus.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="29499"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: u.s.reddy@cs.bham.ac.uk, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, 8399@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 25 17:02:41 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kAaTA-0007XT-NN for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 17:02:40 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43922 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kAaT9-0006Sm-Od for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 11:02:39 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53588) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kAaSY-0005ne-I9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 11:02:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:52354) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kAaSY-0002VS-64 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 11:02:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kAaSY-0004Pl-2j for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 11:02:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 15:02:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 8399 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: fixed Original-Received: via spool by 8399-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B8399.159836769915744 (code B ref 8399); Tue, 25 Aug 2020 15:02:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 8399) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Aug 2020 15:01:39 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35667 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kAaSB-00045U-Bo for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 11:01:39 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:43326) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kAaSA-0003zm-8e for 8399@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 11:01:38 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:39883) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kAaS3-0002QK-Ei; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 11:01:31 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3951 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kAaS2-0002Pe-7p; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 11:01:30 -0400 In-Reply-To: <875z967pd2.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Tue, 25 Aug 2020 16:48:57 +0200) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:186305 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Cc: u.s.reddy@cs.bham.ac.uk, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, 8399@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 16:48:57 +0200 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > In the usual case, i.e. where the file name is not something invented > > by a VM or somesuch, I think the file name is more useful, yes. Or at > > least it could be. So maybe we should offer this as an optional > > feature, as I presume the OP's use case is somewhat rare? > > Sorry; I didn't see this before I made the change. Sorry, I had communications problems that prevented me from responding immediately. > Does the new behaviour (showing both names if they're dissimilar) > look OK to you? I guess it's okay, except that it makes the message longer, so could cause resizing of the echo-area more frequently. But since the additional text is only produced when there's more than one buffer with the same base-name of its visited file name, I guess that's not a disaster. Let's see if users complain. Thanks.