From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: A new user perspective about "Changes for emacs 28" Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2020 19:23:12 +0300 Message-ID: <83tuw8kzkf.fsf@gnu.org> References: <1ca462fa-0f9e-3c18-6386-f43f49388b2f@gmail.com> <20200907180812.5tfylspp7i6vl4o3@Ergus> <94fda087-a61b-356d-4bb4-791907593246@yandex.ru> <24302cf8-5ac8-4abd-83ce-3e33c51a8beb@default> <83k0x4mjsv.fsf@gnu.org> <83363smgq0.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="7433"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: spacibba@aol.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, nicola.manca85@gmail.com, ams@gnu.org, dgutov@yandex.ru, drew.adams@oracle.com To: thibaut.verron@gmail.com Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 08 18:23:48 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kFgPM-0001pA-OJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 08 Sep 2020 18:23:48 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52488 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kFgPL-0004gj-RU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 08 Sep 2020 12:23:47 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44484) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kFgOr-00040C-07 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Sep 2020 12:23:17 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:43670) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kFgOq-00083l-Ee; Tue, 08 Sep 2020 12:23:16 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4353 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kFgOm-0000hh-Jc; Tue, 08 Sep 2020 12:23:13 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Thibaut Verron on Tue, 8 Sep 2020 18:13:10 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:254765 Archived-At: > From: Thibaut Verron > Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2020 18:13:10 +0200 > Cc: "Alfred M. Szmidt" , nicola.manca85@gmail.com, spacibba@aol.com, > emacs-devel , Drew Adams , dgutov@yandex.ru > > I don't know what you tried, but as long as you just use undo and > don't redo (which is what most users do), I don't see how you can > distinguish between the default undo and undo-tree. > > Do you have data backing the claim that most users do not use redo > (or space-undo-undo)? I have my own experience: I use undo about 10 times more frequently than redo.