From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: [solved]: Re: Finding last *Async Shell Command* buffer? Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2021 14:33:30 +0300 Message-ID: <83tuoyp2t1.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87k0puihrd.fsf@robertthorpeconsulting.com> <838s6aqtlv.fsf@gnu.org> <8335wiqrek.fsf@gnu.org> <831rc2qi35.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="10866"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 26 12:34:20 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lPkjM-0002iQ-2u for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 26 Mar 2021 12:34:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55662 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lPkjL-0008O7-4Z for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 26 Mar 2021 07:34:19 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42956) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lPkic-0008Nv-Cz for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Mar 2021 07:33:34 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:57380) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lPkic-0000uH-5A for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Mar 2021 07:33:34 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:2279 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lPkiV-00065G-Is for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Mar 2021 07:33:33 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Jean Louis on Fri, 26 Mar 2021 14:26:13 +0300) X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "help-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.help:128617 Archived-At: > Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2021 14:26:13 +0300 > From: Jean Louis > Cc: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org > > > > For end users I do not think that would make any difference, as the > > > added buffer number is not interactively influencing users. > > > > You are wrong. I use it locally to refer to the many Info buffers I > > have in my sessions. > > Sure, that is clear. I also refer to buffers like that. But how they > get assigned their number on the end like *Async Shell Command*<141> > it does not matter, so it could be 39 or 175, it does not matter. Doesn't matter for your use case. But not necessarily for others.