From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#49786: 28.0.50; [PATCH] package-install shouldn't change default-directory Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2021 09:09:32 +0300 Message-ID: <83tukbovz7.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87h7gb39bt.fsf@dick> <83zgu3poh1.fsf@gnu.org> <87tukbh6vo.fsf@dick> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="28473"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 49786@debbugs.gnu.org, ioannis.kappas@gmail.com To: dick Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Jul 31 08:10:10 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1m9iCI-0007FQ-0Q for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 31 Jul 2021 08:10:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46492 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m9iCH-0000U4-1Y for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 31 Jul 2021 02:10:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47994) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m9iCB-0000Tt-2L for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 31 Jul 2021 02:10:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:49810) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m9iCA-0002ep-Qo for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 31 Jul 2021 02:10:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m9iCA-0007np-Gy for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 31 Jul 2021 02:10:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2021 06:10:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 49786 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: notabug patch Original-Received: via spool by 49786-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B49786.162771179729979 (code B ref 49786); Sat, 31 Jul 2021 06:10:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 49786) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Jul 2021 06:09:57 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33123 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m9iC5-0007nT-JI for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 31 Jul 2021 02:09:57 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:50212) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m9iC3-0007nD-0U for 49786@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 31 Jul 2021 02:09:55 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:42364) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m9iBx-0002S0-7d; Sat, 31 Jul 2021 02:09:49 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:3954 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m9iBw-00088u-RD; Sat, 31 Jul 2021 02:09:49 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87tukbh6vo.fsf@dick> (message from dick on Fri, 30 Jul 2021 16:41:15 -0400) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:210957 Archived-At: > From: dick > Cc: Ioannis Kappas , 49786@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2021 16:41:15 -0400 > > EZ> The 'mac' encoding is documented in the ELisp manual. Please don't remove > EZ> its testing here. > > Ah, so it does. I'm rather content to let the OS9 diehards stew in > their own obsolescence. There's no telling what else doesn't work on an OS > that was last released in the twentieth century. But it's impossible to > disabuse the maintainer of the maintainer ethos: "preservation above-all" [1]. The 'mac' encoding is not about that old OS, it's about documents written on that OS. The documents can outlive their OS by many decades.