From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: describe-char on emoji sequences Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2021 19:26:23 +0300 Message-ID: <83tuh2v3gw.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87cznths5j.fsf@gnus.org> <822aec9d01909cecfc6c@heytings.org> <87a6iwhltf.fsf@gnus.org> <83tuh4zfg5.fsf@gnu.org> <87y26gfobr.fsf@gnus.org> <87tuh4f1ie.fsf@gnus.org> <87lf2fg44h.fsf@gnus.org> <87h7d3g2uu.fsf@gnus.org> <83bl3bybm3.fsf@gnu.org> <878ryfr9w0.fsf@gmail.com> <878ryfg07k.fsf@gnus.org> <874k93r869.fsf@gmail.com> <87r1c7d28k.fsf_-_@gnus.org> <83zgqvwpq2.fsf@gnu.org> <87mtmvd13h.fsf@gnus.org> <87pmrqa8he.fsf@gnus.org> <87zgqu8q1q.fsf@igel.home> <83zgquv4f3.fsf@gnu.org> <87r1c68n09.fsf@igel.home> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="27226"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: larsi@gnus.org, cloos@jhcloos.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Andreas Schwab Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 27 18:54:31 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mfmC6-0006tb-EM for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 18:54:30 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42718 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mfmC5-0002Ub-4J for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 12:54:29 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51918) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mflkz-0000vq-A3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 12:26:29 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:43188) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mflkv-0001Av-Su; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 12:26:27 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=1UZ58F1W1FoP5GHX/PQ9zlHO4E9lmwuZl0VFzSLsPbE=; b=rJ3bfx5+IIZZ 3QPi5ieCDUogJw6jP2qFHjPkvRIIfyb835ZD7/oMqSO9pNAIzsLmBStl+vyB2sMYDI9v3cLvgifqc nDYOnNCtJGoOhTKjk8NYm1LzxGiDos68674d+5JCMA9O4+cUWWkNXxFbAmlPgTJtHX+Vdsf804ZDm nz9tFmt6R6wGQlknM3DYXNEutbMP3FrCJMRHxK2IROWR0UdD0371yiRwAKvVr3mgtAn/1QIBX5azI fvso0NK1H6nFvG1rxv7zil00mhbzRoVEnjjYvk5MDyQ4TiEykA2UdCMitFE7Dxuyu0jzh7s5weB4M qyDA7uriAXDZnMr35zT9Aw==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=3543 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mflku-0001JD-JJ; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 12:26:25 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87r1c68n09.fsf@igel.home> (message from Andreas Schwab on Wed, 27 Oct 2021 18:12:54 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:278002 Archived-At: > From: Andreas Schwab > Cc: larsi@gnus.org, cloos@jhcloos.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2021 18:12:54 +0200 > > On Okt 27 2021, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > If so, perhaps Noto Color Emoji is of an old version that doesn't > > support some of the characters we require for it to be considered a > > match for emoji? > > noto-coloremoji-fonts-20191119-1.9.noarch That's the latest, AFAICT. Can you show the details of your build, the stuff that report-emacs-bug collects? Then Lars and Robert could compare with what they get, and maybe that would give us a hint? Another idea is to compare font-log from your build with that from a build that does display the Emoji with Noto Color Emoji.