From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [External] : Pop-up-windows vs display-buffer-take-action Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2023 20:07:51 +0200 Message-ID: <83ttzmajk8.fsf@gnu.org> References: <831qmqc0be.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="14493"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: raman@google.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 15 19:08:55 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pSMD8-0003Yx-F7 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 15 Feb 2023 19:08:54 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pSMCV-0005CT-2J; Wed, 15 Feb 2023 13:08:15 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pSMCR-0005By-Tj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Feb 2023 13:08:12 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pSMCQ-0005d0-K0; Wed, 15 Feb 2023 13:08:11 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=nINezk85uDHlKymkPuj+we6UzXFC1EvHrE7xhASk+X0=; b=p+sW5gdxnOe+ 9VJSKaoQzcjOUZT9XPeSxO8IQAfsM7fkFItJ6TSfni2LOGkx77x1KEvjcn8H0jMq0yAU0W8rZiAIR WZ7Fe9i6FTDKcTR3dPUx+uvCT0fuV5VDOkHP3dzm5DNJWEolmh1ME5RYwMTb9usnE5GZzJqgtleWV Y9Ov5BfkNpOeOj9TIG2N9LL98X9tqfD26jJpDftEGnZ+K1LnjORqroBVof+M19FtCHw2O+3tC8mYd zw12kq0rB9ekxwrrtGqqy+OchuFdbEKl0oD7gx7LmjwKL+GTcuDMzc7SDsHzU4AIcUtme7NH0MdLP FiNdGcC211AY2MmzXNLpLg==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pSMCP-0005jg-Rr; Wed, 15 Feb 2023 13:08:10 -0500 In-Reply-To: (message from Drew Adams on Wed, 15 Feb 2023 17:38:34 +0000) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:303315 Archived-At: > From: Drew Adams > CC: "raman@google.com" , > "emacs-devel@gnu.org" > > Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2023 17:38:34 +0000 > > > And where do you see that this variable is deprecated, btw? > > You're right that I didn't see the word > "deprecated" as such. If you think > "deprecated" is not meant, so much the better. > Glad to hear that. > > To be clearer, the (28.2) doc string says this: > > This variable is provided mainly for backward > compatibility and should not be used in new code. > To make 'display-buffer' behave as if this were t, > customize 'display-buffer-base-action' instead. That doesn't sound like deprecation to me. > What I pointed out wrt referring to "used in new > code" stands. That's a recommendation, nothing more, nothing less.