From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: jinx Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2023 17:26:33 +0300 Message-ID: <83ttxxujmu.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87sfdnyuxc.fsf@posteo.de> <83sfdl2z26.fsf@gnu.org> <86tty0ydnl.fsf@gnu.org> <83fs9k20tu.fsf@gnu.org> <86edp4yarm.fsf@gnu.org> <83sfdkysph.fsf@gnu.org> <86wn2woxov.fsf@gnu.org> <83mt3syq8h.fsf@gnu.org> <87pm8lxi1n.fsf@web.de> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="26251"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: arash@gnu.org, rms@gnu.org, m.eliachevitch@posteo.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Michael Heerdegen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 03 16:27:15 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pjL9O-0006da-P5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 03 Apr 2023 16:27:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pjL8s-0004N2-Vd; Mon, 03 Apr 2023 10:26:42 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pjL8r-0004Ms-KX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Apr 2023 10:26:41 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pjL8r-0005oR-AC; Mon, 03 Apr 2023 10:26:41 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=EeSjNiIb73zfS2RUyJAksf82PDBggMiZeMuAIvD6tHM=; b=ZiuTGmjZ+SgF vd8nNW1E0NzwE1ApvkamlTlAzWVgEuAb7rW/5WDEkdV3EmNAaWy6o+suWBLQh630tLkFe0gEXjpC3 I2iniWwl05JHlVFNUw4cfIqu/iQOU/4Nh23UWtixZ1Ps/a6oMYTC3iLy6Iq6RqbzskMYRxU34GcuP CIlZmeWqajNIjBe3T1/TnJ4pVNibslYoSZdmJLKMjI1o/IutbmR4CnhFhiV8f9pHwV94ATvfzuC1E pDfbQQ20eJ+l3mB+5hsGAzuk2oSX9A7lIEEpysMYRUY81XyZcMu+AeKfV9r10jYxJ1UMxhQGisf0Z KMqIuEWtCeuG9RJ4SpGO0w==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pjL8O-0007BB-91; Mon, 03 Apr 2023 10:26:12 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87pm8lxi1n.fsf@web.de> (message from Michael Heerdegen on Mon, 03 Apr 2023 14:32:36 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:305077 Archived-At: > From: Michael Heerdegen > Cc: Arash Esbati , rms@gnu.org, m.eliachevitch@posteo.de, > emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2023 14:32:36 +0200 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > > From: Arash Esbati > > > Cc: rms@gnu.org, m.eliachevitch@posteo.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org > > > Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2023 09:42:40 +0200 > > > > > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > > > > > I'm not sure I understand item c), though: when and why would one want > > > > to spell-check macros and environments? > > > > > > Sorry, I meant to say arguments/bodies of macros/environments, not the > > > name of macros and environments. > > > > This is again not TeX-specific. Similar issues exist in Texinfo and > > in other markup languages. The annoyance is usually minor: it's > > enough to tell the speller to "accept" a word just once, since the > > number of markup codes is usually very small. But it would be nicer, > > of course, if Emacs could automatically skip markup in each major > > mode. > > Wasn't that the purpose of `flyspell-prog-mode'? Markup languages are usually not descendants of prog-modes. Or maybe I misunderstand what you are saying.