From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Stability of project.el Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2023 15:02:20 +0300 Message-ID: <83ttua7j1v.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87wmz7ioo9.fsf@posteo.net> <1b2546a1-f0e5-7f6f-4853-21bdf746d6c9@gutov.dev> <87wmz7auic.fsf@posteo.net> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="22203"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: dmitry@gutov.dev, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Philip Kaludercic Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Jul 11 14:05:41 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qJC7g-0005VW-PN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 11 Jul 2023 14:05:40 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qJC6b-0005fI-4B; Tue, 11 Jul 2023 08:04:33 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qJC4G-0004VS-RQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Jul 2023 08:02:11 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qJC4G-0000C7-H5; Tue, 11 Jul 2023 08:02:08 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=KHnJPVqqOt4YRY4vENOjzqhtiyITbCh7OH/mqgaF9lY=; b=nuIhJXXFj0nq ToJiJN/K4LV2eTWblFiAq5NJtQJtA5YGi3sdNt2etcabQ7wyENlqUKJnE1hn4XjxLmGWIdvCHb8Dm 75GIjfoL4XKjSbbzFW6AEPDzYIeR+ITmBStgarXt/p7Cbv51+k7pnM1hlb1N6qelFbAFzhXW7DslY oPaTlnHgLHThnlPh0HUEXAolIW16OYiQl8iByXEyQVUG32o331W77djpvdCphP2ZGj2C4/38C/RdR 4aoy4cSMqzh6CQyJ9p53IEsaZSuGVwnOK+d7st+myMX6AEVqLQrD59EqdHmTRqRbZw9A5o6x15q8b JOpwj5rPBPynhT3/wzRWHA==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qJC4F-0007iQ-W9; Tue, 11 Jul 2023 08:02:08 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87wmz7auic.fsf@posteo.net> (message from Philip Kaludercic on Tue, 11 Jul 2023 05:26:35 +0000) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:307746 Archived-At: > From: Philip Kaludercic > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2023 05:26:35 +0000 > > Dmitry Gutov writes: > > > I think that's a good idea. Even if there still some less-than-ideal > > bits, we need to maintain it backward-compatibly, given the age. > > Great. Should the major version number also be bumped? > > > And documentation-only changes should still be good for Emacs 29. > > Eli, what do you say? This changes no code, so the decision is entirely up to Dmitry, and AFAIU he already made the decision.