From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Please, Restore Previous Behavior for jump-to-register Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2023 09:48:35 +0200 Message-ID: <83ttolql64.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87h6kr9817.fsf@posteo.net> <87a5qi1vui.fsf@posteo.net> <87bkayjoga.fsf@linux-m68k.org> <83wmtmumud.fsf@gnu.org> <874jgq0zdh.fsf@posteo.net> <25974.5401.926181.432049@retriever.mtv.corp.google.com> <25974.24010.49674.989981@retriever.mtv.corp.google.com> <83lea0vs8w.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="10833"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, raman@google.com, thievol@posteo.net, eduardoochs@gmail.com, ams@gnu.org, schwab@linux-m68k.org, eller.helmut@gmail.com, tino.calancha@gmail.com To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Jo=E3o_T=E1vora?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Dec 14 08:49:31 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rDgTK-0002XH-GW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 14 Dec 2023 08:49:30 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rDgSY-0003IK-MO; Thu, 14 Dec 2023 02:48:42 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rDgSW-0003I9-Ic for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Dec 2023 02:48:40 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rDgSV-00060W-Hw; Thu, 14 Dec 2023 02:48:39 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-version:References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From: Date; bh=v67VNkCTgXaJ8gvBvRjoUter9ijKUO2L4sfs1JTv1Wo=; b=Xif4qBmPi+OC7YuXHinl Iiub8T6/agz7p9ka2s8YAt2fO9usmhZ9bKK3CGD4/oOQzBEX+deh3CBvDwUTzaKzQePReYN47ye++ ZwzpWt9QhOEWOsiQ1kOJBf6VlxgjTc85DRgRxyfXgAh1dcFlskig/r8VkDA2NdKD+IGxx4242WsQg /rwoYddWETWNb8XEVbHEjs5F04giZ0dimf5rb+0ouy0wDVWhAXY9/NjeVpg1FXY6mwR1A0U1S1zbi nv/dR1L9DhWYJJFVwbMmIlP5P2I2xnURwO7u1GfZvFCSFKEOpRs29Xy8+/gjTJXHgrgIT77GAdUUL J69TikWFjLP6cA==; In-Reply-To: (message from =?iso-8859-1?Q?Jo=E3o_T=E1vora?= on Tue, 12 Dec 2023 10:05:05 +0000) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:313757 Archived-At: What do people who opined on these matters think about the default proposed in https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=66394#249, in the 3rd patch there? https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=66394#276 seems to indicate at least two people think it's a good default. Please post your opinions either here or in that bug discussion (but not both). Thanks.