From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Switch the Windows port to using Unicode keyboard input Date: Sun, 04 Oct 2009 21:17:00 +0200 Message-ID: <83skdznf4j.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83y6nrnthg.fsf@gnu.org> <4AC8B391.4020906@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1254684003 24003 80.91.229.12 (4 Oct 2009 19:20:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 19:20:03 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, lennart.borgman@gmail.com, jasonr@gnu.org To: Eugen Anghel Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Oct 04 21:19:55 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MuWcd-0002fx-91 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 04 Oct 2009 21:19:55 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55563 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MuWcd-0008W1-9S for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 04 Oct 2009 15:19:55 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MuWcY-0008VK-58 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Oct 2009 15:19:50 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MuWcW-0008V8-Kr for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Oct 2009 15:19:48 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=53981 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MuWcW-0008V5-FJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Oct 2009 15:19:48 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout6.012.net.il ([84.95.2.16]:33210) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MuWcU-0006JZ-MI; Sun, 04 Oct 2009 15:19:46 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.i-mtaout6.012.net.il by i-mtaout6.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0KR000A00879P000@i-mtaout6.012.net.il>; Sun, 04 Oct 2009 21:19:03 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.229.44.55]) by i-mtaout6.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0KR000JB98BQTC50@i-mtaout6.012.net.il>; Sun, 04 Oct 2009 21:19:02 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (1203?) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:115898 Archived-At: > From: Eugen Anghel > Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 20:41:53 +0300 > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > Is having two separate binaries, one for 9x/Me and one for XP/Vista an > option? That would be inconvenient (need two binaries on FTP sites, migrating from 9x to XP needs to install a different binary, etc.). So I think we should do this only if there's no better solution.