* Recompile files
@ 2010-04-16 9:53 Andrea Crotti
2010-04-16 10:32 ` Eli Zaretskii
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Andrea Crotti @ 2010-04-16 9:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: help-gnu-emacs
I was wondering if I should recompile or not all my el files. At the
moment I notice it takes quite long to boot at my emacs, and I guess
that would make it much faster.
But I also use the same configuration in different OS/versions.
So if I compile on one and then I copy the whole configuration on the
other I guess it might cause some troubles...
How do you handle this? Should I keep everything compiled on each
machine and not transfer the *.elc files?
But then when I modify something I would again need to compile it
everywhere, and I would need some way to detect this automatically.
Someone has already solved this problem maybe?
Thanks
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: Recompile files
2010-04-16 9:53 Recompile files Andrea Crotti
@ 2010-04-16 10:32 ` Eli Zaretskii
2010-04-17 9:29 ` Andrea Crotti
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Eli Zaretskii @ 2010-04-16 10:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: help-gnu-emacs
> From: Andrea Crotti <andrea.crotti.0@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 11:53:39 +0200
>
> But I also use the same configuration in different OS/versions.
>
> So if I compile on one and then I copy the whole configuration on the
> other I guess it might cause some troubles...
No, it won't. The *.elc files are OS- and architecture-independent.
So you can use them on any platform without fear, provided that you
have roughly the same version of Emacs installed on all of them.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: Recompile files
2010-04-16 10:32 ` Eli Zaretskii
@ 2010-04-17 9:29 ` Andrea Crotti
2010-04-17 9:58 ` Peter Dyballa
2010-04-17 10:14 ` Peter Dyballa
0 siblings, 2 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Andrea Crotti @ 2010-04-17 9:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: help-gnu-emacs
Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>
> No, it won't. The *.elc files are OS- and architecture-independent.
> So you can use them on any platform without fear, provided that you
> have roughly the same version of Emacs installed on all of them.
Ok good to know, but I would like to have this done automatically
- at boot recompile every new *.el file which doesn't have the compiled
version
- check if the .el is newer than the compiled and compile it
automatically if not
- check that the files are from more or less compiled with the same
versions and print out a big warning otherwise...
By the way now emacs is eating too much memory, with nothing open
53Mb, just opening GNUS I reached 193Mb :O I don't think that's the normality
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: Recompile files
2010-04-17 9:29 ` Andrea Crotti
@ 2010-04-17 9:58 ` Peter Dyballa
2010-04-17 10:14 ` Andrea Crotti
2010-04-17 10:14 ` Peter Dyballa
1 sibling, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Peter Dyballa @ 2010-04-17 9:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrea Crotti; +Cc: help-gnu-emacs
Am 17.04.2010 um 11:29 schrieb Andrea Crotti:
> By the way now emacs is eating too much memory, with nothing open
> 53Mb, just opening GNUS I reached 193Mb :O I don't think that's the
> normality
Yes, indeed! You should run GNU Emacs in a virtual machine with X11R1
– then the number of shared libraries was negligible and their size
very small. Dozens of them fit on a 20 MB disk. And there was still
space for a dozen users and their data.
--
Greetings
Pete
When people run around and around in circles we say they are crazy.
When planets do it we say they are orbiting.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: Recompile files
2010-04-17 9:58 ` Peter Dyballa
@ 2010-04-17 10:14 ` Andrea Crotti
2010-04-17 10:30 ` Peter Dyballa
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Andrea Crotti @ 2010-04-17 10:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: help-gnu-emacs
Peter Dyballa <Peter_Dyballa@Web.DE> writes:
>
>
> Yes, indeed! You should run GNU Emacs in a virtual machine with X11R1
> – then the number of shared libraries was negligible and their size
> very small. Dozens of them fit on a 20 MB disk. And there was still
> space for a dozen users and their data.
Ok good but I'm on a Mac, why should I use a virtual machine only to run
Emacs?
I also like the Cocoa version more than the terminal, and I think that
would not be possible right?
If I'm not wrong some time ago it was not eating so much memory, I guess
it's the configuration that needs a huge diet...
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: Recompile files
2010-04-17 9:29 ` Andrea Crotti
2010-04-17 9:58 ` Peter Dyballa
@ 2010-04-17 10:14 ` Peter Dyballa
2010-04-17 13:39 ` Andrea Crotti
1 sibling, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Peter Dyballa @ 2010-04-17 10:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrea Crotti; +Cc: help-gnu-emacs
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 238 bytes --]
Am 17.04.2010 um 11:29 schrieb Andrea Crotti:
> By the way now emacs is eating too much memory, with nothing open
> 53Mb, just opening GNUS I reached 193Mb :O I don't think that's the
> normality
BTW, does this picture help a bit?
[-- Attachment #2: GNU Emacs mem size.png --]
[-- Type: image/png, Size: 17706 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 106 bytes --]
--
Greetings
Pete
Some day we may discover how to make magnets that can point in any
direction.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: Recompile files
2010-04-17 10:14 ` Andrea Crotti
@ 2010-04-17 10:30 ` Peter Dyballa
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Peter Dyballa @ 2010-04-17 10:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrea Crotti; +Cc: help-gnu-emacs
Am 17.04.2010 um 12:14 schrieb Andrea Crotti:
> If I'm not wrong some time ago it was not eating so much memory, I
> guess
> it's the configuration that needs a huge diet...
Or the OS... Use Activity Monitor and lsof a bit!
--
Greetings
Pete
To most people solutions mean finding the answers. But to chemists
solutions
are things that are still all mixed up.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: Recompile files
2010-04-17 10:14 ` Peter Dyballa
@ 2010-04-17 13:39 ` Andrea Crotti
2010-04-17 14:55 ` Peter Dyballa
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Andrea Crotti @ 2010-04-17 13:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: help-gnu-emacs
Peter Dyballa <Peter_Dyballa@Web.DE> writes:
>
> BTW, does this picture help a bit?
Yes thanks, well running Emacs -q (always cocoa) and only loading gnus I
get more or less your values...
So I'll have to restructure my conf, which I'm already doing passing to
org-mode configuration...
But WTH is emacs-24? Are you ahead on time?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: Recompile files
2010-04-17 13:39 ` Andrea Crotti
@ 2010-04-17 14:55 ` Peter Dyballa
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Peter Dyballa @ 2010-04-17 14:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrea Crotti; +Cc: help-gnu-emacs
Am 17.04.2010 um 15:39 schrieb Andrea Crotti:
> But WTH is emacs-24?
It's the new development version.
> Are you ahead on time?
No. Right now I'am probably a few hours behind...
--
Greetings
Pete
When Richard Stallman goes to the loo, he core dumps.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-04-17 14:55 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-04-16 9:53 Recompile files Andrea Crotti
2010-04-16 10:32 ` Eli Zaretskii
2010-04-17 9:29 ` Andrea Crotti
2010-04-17 9:58 ` Peter Dyballa
2010-04-17 10:14 ` Andrea Crotti
2010-04-17 10:30 ` Peter Dyballa
2010-04-17 10:14 ` Peter Dyballa
2010-04-17 13:39 ` Andrea Crotti
2010-04-17 14:55 ` Peter Dyballa
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.