From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Suggestion to indicate fixed version when closing a bug Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2011 07:34:50 +0200 Message-ID: <83sjkrllhh.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83d3bwn7mu.fsf@gnu.org> <5dhb18p7i7.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <834nx8mcud.fsf@gnu.org> <83y5ukkucx.fsf@gnu.org> <87mxb05dk7.fsf@floss.red-bean.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1323581699 16238 80.91.229.12 (11 Dec 2011 05:34:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2011 05:34:59 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Karl Fogel Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Dec 11 06:34:56 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RZc3r-00049a-Ra for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 11 Dec 2011 06:34:55 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48693 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RZc3r-0001a4-DN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 11 Dec 2011 00:34:55 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:57682) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RZc3o-0001Zz-EQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Dec 2011 00:34:53 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RZc3n-00080T-HC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Dec 2011 00:34:52 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:46503) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RZc3n-00080P-8P; Sun, 11 Dec 2011 00:34:51 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LW000300Y4BU900@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Sun, 11 Dec 2011 07:34:49 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.124.199.182]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LW0002JOY606S11@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Sun, 11 Dec 2011 07:34:49 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <87mxb05dk7.fsf@floss.red-bean.com> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 80.179.55.172 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:146639 Archived-At: > From: Karl Fogel > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2011 16:20:24 -0500 > > You meant the version number ("edition", "release", whatever) of Emacs > in which the bug was fixed, not revision information about the change > that fixed it. > > The latter is what I've been (mistakenly) talking about in this thread; I've been mentioning the revision number when closing bug reports since quite some time ago.