From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs Windows barebin distribution Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2012 09:50:51 +0200 Message-ID: <83sj883bxg.fsf@gnu.org> References: <4F8ADAFC.9030308@gmail.com> <831unp0xzq.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1353138691 12067 80.91.229.3 (17 Nov 2012 07:51:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2012 07:51:31 +0000 (UTC) Cc: cschol2112@googlemail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dani Moncayo Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 17 08:51:42 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TZdBk-0002ch-LQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 17 Nov 2012 08:51:40 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43652 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TZdBa-0001Js-Od for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 17 Nov 2012 02:51:30 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:58190) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TZdBW-0001JU-5G for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Nov 2012 02:51:29 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TZdBT-0005eL-3h for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Nov 2012 02:51:26 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout23.012.net.il ([80.179.55.175]:56010) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TZdBS-0005e3-RQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Nov 2012 02:51:23 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout23.012.net.il by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MDM00700GFGVZ00@a-mtaout23.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Nov 2012 09:51:21 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MDM007JVGHKRO40@a-mtaout23.012.net.il>; Sat, 17 Nov 2012 09:51:21 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 80.179.55.175 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:154896 Archived-At: > Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 23:48:27 +0100 > From: Dani Moncayo > Cc: Christoph Scholtes , emacs-devel@gnu.org > > On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 6:18 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > >> Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2012 08:28:12 -0600 > >> From: Christoph Scholtes > >> > >> The purpose of the Emacs Windows barebin distribution has been > >> questioned a couple of times. Does it still make sense to build it or > >> can we save the time and server space? > > > > I suggest to omit it the next time you produce binaries and see if > > anyone complains. > > AFAIK, nobody complained, and if nobody cares about that "barebin" > distribution, why spend time making it? > > So please could we apply the attached patch? Fine with me.