From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Hit eassert introduced in r110971 Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2013 18:02:43 +0300 Message-ID: <83sj31awvg.fsf@gnu.org> References: <51604EBE.1070306@yandex.ru> <83vc7zcxon.fsf@gnu.org> <83sj33cvvx.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1365445547 2060 80.91.229.3 (8 Apr 2013 18:25:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2013 18:25:47 +0000 (UTC) Cc: dmantipov@yandex.ru, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 08 20:25:50 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UPGlB-0004Y8-Ta for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 08 Apr 2013 20:25:42 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54497 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UPDav-0000LS-Jn for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 08 Apr 2013 11:02:53 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:48764) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UPDao-0000LI-77 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Apr 2013 11:02:51 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UPDae-0007d3-A3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Apr 2013 11:02:46 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:64446) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UPDae-0007cg-0l for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Apr 2013 11:02:36 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MKX00300YWW1100@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Apr 2013 18:02:34 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MKX001OCZ49EIN0@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Mon, 08 Apr 2013 18:02:34 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 80.179.55.166 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:158763 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Cc: dmantipov@yandex.ru, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Sat, 06 Apr 2013 20:36:35 -0400 > > AFAIK, if this assertion fails, it means we have a problem somewhere. > Not necessarily in update_tool_bar, but somewhere. OTOH it is a problem > that will very rarely cause real trouble once you deactivate > the assertion. So what we need to do is to add similar assertions > elsewhere to work our way up to the root of the problem. OK, let's investigate this. But I don't have access to a system that can open a GUI and a TTY frame from the same Emacs session. So can someone please reproduce this assertion violation and tell: . which frame is the selected frame at the assertion spot? . which code changes the selected frame and/or the selected window in the course of the recipe? (this could be done by setting watchpoints on selected_frame and selected_window, for example.)