From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: x-display-pixel-width/height inconsistency Date: Thu, 09 May 2013 05:53:50 +0300 Message-ID: <83sj1wdfsx.fsf@gnu.org> References: <514A5DE1.10009@gmx.de> <831ub767wf.fsf@gnu.org> <83mwtu4p7c.fsf@gnu.org> <83vc8h313t.fsf@gnu.org> <5073D6B8-95E4-4012-AA74-106F428379DC@swipnet.se> <8BD4B041-5A3F-4D7C-AFD3-E997E194AA9D@swipnet.se> <02B98FCD-71DB-47EC-B58B-41A2539FF61A@swipnet.se> <83vc6tcqss.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1368068075 31488 80.91.229.3 (9 May 2013 02:54:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 9 May 2013 02:54:35 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu May 09 04:54:31 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UaH02-0005fF-Qo for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 09 May 2013 04:54:30 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51225 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UaH02-0000x4-Bo for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 08 May 2013 22:54:30 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:43230) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UaGzz-0000wz-98 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 08 May 2013 22:54:28 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UaGzy-0005F5-4s for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 08 May 2013 22:54:27 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout21.012.net.il ([80.179.55.169]:34666) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UaGzx-0005Em-T9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 08 May 2013 22:54:26 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout21.012.net.il by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MMI00D00FVCSS00@a-mtaout21.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 09 May 2013 05:53:53 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MMI00DKSG1TPX20@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Thu, 09 May 2013 05:53:53 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 80.179.55.169 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:159439 Archived-At: > Date: Thu, 09 May 2013 09:09:33 +0900 > From: YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > I don't know how ELisp manual is usually updated. Is it supposed to > be done by the same person who designed/implemented the new functions? This is the best alternative, yes. Otherwise, this is left for the pretest, which prolongs it and also increases the probability that a function will be left undocumented.