From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#16884: 24.3.50; desktop-read should not die on non-existing directories Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 21:04:25 +0200 Message-ID: <83sir5y9ty.fsf@gnu.org> References: <1gsir5ixp3.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <83wqghybv6.fsf@gnu.org> <83vbw1yb8i.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1393441517 22756 80.91.229.3 (26 Feb 2014 19:05:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 19:05:17 +0000 (UTC) Cc: sds@gnu.org, 16884@debbugs.gnu.org To: Juanma Barranquero Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 26 20:05:21 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WIjnB-0002vJ-Pk for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 20:05:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42840 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WIjnB-0000gX-C5 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 14:05:17 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53818) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WIjn2-0000cF-TM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 14:05:15 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WIjmx-0005nV-2y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 14:05:08 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:40576) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WIjmw-0005mb-TF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 14:05:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WIjmw-0000Qp-Jc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 14:05:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 19:05:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16884 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 16884-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16884.13934414771614 (code B ref 16884); Wed, 26 Feb 2014 19:05:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 16884) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Feb 2014 19:04:37 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41758 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WIjmW-0000Py-TE for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 14:04:37 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:34476) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WIjmQ-0000Pj-8r for 16884@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 14:04:35 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0N1M00K00A12N800@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for 16884@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 21:04:28 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0N1M00KRTABGEV40@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 21:04:28 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:86287 Archived-At: > From: Juanma Barranquero > Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 19:36:05 +0100 > Cc: Glenn Morris , Sam Steingold , 16884@debbugs.gnu.org > > On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 7:34 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > Why do you expect an error to be thrown? > > I don't expect it. I get it, when using the ls executable, and that's > also what Sam and Glenn are reporting. AFAIK, what happens when a wildcard matches nothing is implementation defined. What exactly depends on an error being thrown in this case?